本文介绍了在m-t-m上使用基于类的UpdateView与中介模型的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!
问题描述
如何说服基于Django 1.3类的通用视图:
UpdateView.as_view(model = Category,
template_name ='generic_form.html',
success_url ='/ category /')
不要放弃这么容易的错误:
无法在指定中间模型的ManyToManyField上设置值。
即使中介模型中的所有字段都有默认值,我也无法获取基于类的通用视图保存。基于功能的版本看起来也很乱。 Django 1.3。
解决方案
正如Berislav Lopac所说:
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
$ $ b IntermediateModel.objects.filter(category = self.object).delete()
for form_lear_data中的other_side_model_object ['other_side_model_field']:
intermediate_model = IntermediateModel()
intermediate_model.category = self.object
intermediate_model.other_side_model_related_field = other_side_model_object
intermediate_model.save()
返回超级(ModelFormMixin,self).form_valid(form)
/ pre>
我回答了一些类似的。
How can I convince a Django 1.3 class based generic view:
UpdateView.as_view(model=Category, template_name='generic_form.html', success_url='/category/')
To not give up so easy with error:
"Cannot set values on a ManyToManyField which specifies an intermediary model."
Even if all fields in the intermediary model have defaults, I can't get the class based generic view to save. The functional based version looks messy also. Django 1.3.
解决方案As Berislav Lopac says:
class CategoryView(UpdateView): model=Category def form_valid(self, form): self.object = form.save(commit=False) IntermediateModel.objects.filter(category = self.object).delete() for other_side_model_object in form.cleaned_data['other_side_model_field']: intermediate_model = IntermediateModel() intermediate_model.category = self.object intermediate_model.other_side_model_related_field= other_side_model_object intermediate_model.save() return super(ModelFormMixin, self).form_valid(form)
I answer some similar here.
这篇关于在m-t-m上使用基于类的UpdateView与中介模型的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持!