lowagie和iText有什么区别？

问题描述

lowagie和iText有什么区别？这只是版本差异还是库的升级。建议使用哪一个？

What is the difference between lowagie and iText? Is this just version difference or an upgrade to the library. Which one is recommended to be used?

推荐答案

我是Lowagie，你提到的低音。这就是我要说的：

I am Lowagie, the lowagie you refer to. This is what I have to say about this: http://itextpdf.com/salesfaq

您应该使用最新版本的iText。目前这是iText 5.3.4。

You should use the latest version of iText. Currently that's iText 5.3.4.

我是iText的原创作者和iText in Action书籍的作者。

I'm the original author of iText and the author of the "iText in Action" books.

旧版iText（iText 2.xy可追溯至2009年7月或更早版本）与较新版本的iText之间的差异可在更新日志中找到：

The differences between old versions of iText (iText 2.x.y dates from July 2009 or earlier) and newer versions of iText can be found in the changelogs: http://itextpdf.com/changelog

5.0.0版本有以下重大变化：

The 5.0.0 version had the following substantial changes:

• iText和iTextSharp使用相同的版本号开始使用


• 使用Java 5编译iText.jar（而不是使用JDK编译） 1.4）。


• F / OSS许可证已从MPL / LGPL升级到AGPL。


• 包裹名称已从<$ c $更改c> com.lowagie 到 com.itextpdf 。


• 工具箱和RTF支持已被删除：他们现在在SourceForge的一个单独的项目中。

• iText and iTextSharp started using the same version numbers
• the iText.jar is compiled using Java 5 (instead of with the JDK 1.4).
• The F/OSS license has been upgraded from MPL/LGPL to AGPL.
• The package names have changed from com.lowagie to com.itextpdf.
• The toolbox and RTF support have been removed: they are now in a separate project at SourceForge.

自2009年7月以来，已经修复了许多错误。使您的PDF具有面向未来的优势，例如有关新数字签名标准的更新以及PDF / UA，PDF / A-2和PDF / A-3等新标准仅适用于最近的iText版本。

Numerous bugs have been fixed since July 2009. Functionality that makes your PDFs future-proof such as updates regarding new digital signature standards and new standards such as PDF/UA, PDF/A-2 and PDF/A-3 is only available in the more recent iText versions.

这篇关于lowagie和iText有什么区别？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持！