本文介绍了可选绑定试试?并作为?仍然会生成一个可选类型的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

我有执行 NSFetchRequest 的代码,并将其结果转换为我的自定义数据模型类型的数组。提取可能会抛出,但我不想关心错误所以我使用尝试?,我还使用作为?在铸造中。在Swift 2中,这曾经很好,但是Swift 3产生了一个双重选项:

I have code for executing an NSFetchRequest and casting its result to an array of my custom data model type. Fetching may throw but I don't want to care about the error so I use try?, and I also use as? in casting. In Swift 2, this used to be just fine, but Swift 3 produces a double optional:

var expenses: [Expense]? {
    let request = NSFetchRequest<NSFetchRequestResult>(entityName: Expense.entityName)
    request.predicate = NSPredicate(format: "dateSpent >= %@ AND dateSpent <= %@", [self.startDate, self.endDate])

    // Returns [Expense]? because right side is [Expense]??
    if let expenses = try? App.mainQueueContext.fetch(request) as? [Expense],
        expenses?.isEmpty == false {
        return expenses
    }
    return nil
}

如果允许,我如何在中重新定义可选绑定的右侧,以便其类型简单是一个数组 [费用] ?我认为在下面的布尔条件(曾经是 where 子句)中看起来很荒谬,数组仍然是可选的。

How can I rephrase the right side of my optional binding in if let so that its type will simply be an array [Expense]? I think it looks absurd that in the following boolean condition (which used to be a where clause), the array is still optional.

推荐答案

你必须在括号内包装 try?,如下所示:

You must wrap your try? call within parenthesis like this :

if let expenses = (try? App.mainQueueContext.fetch(request)) as? [Expense]

那是因为为?有优先级高于尝试?(可能是因为 try?可以应用于整个表达式。)

That's because as? has a higher precedence than try? (probably because try? can be applied to the whole expression).

这篇关于可选绑定试试?并作为?仍然会生成一个可选类型的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持!

10-28 01:51