问题描述
写了一篇废弃java和C ++的文章后，值得注意的LISP大师
保罗格雷厄姆正在slashdot上烤。除了AutoCAD和
Emacs之外，LISP还做了什么？在系统开发的情况下，大多数实际工作都是用C ++或C
完成的。 Perl很有用，但仅适用于
动态Web内容或简单的sysadmin脚本。大多数slashdotters
的想法一样！
有些人将格雷厄姆与埃里克·雷蒙德的比较作为他的鼻涕。当麻省理工学院的AI实验室为SUN
工作站扔掉他们的LISP机器时，LISP'
时代结束了！
（Pauls-article-here（）
After writing an article trashing java, and C++, notable LISP guru
Paul Graham is getting roasted on slashdot. Apart from AutoCAD and
Emacs, what has LISP done anyway? Most real work is done in C++ or C
in the case of systems development. Perl is useful, but only for
dynamic web content or simple sysadmin scripts. Most slashdotters
think the same!
Some are comparing Graham to Eric S. Raymond for his snobery. LISP''s
era ended when MIT''s AI Lab threw out their LISP machines for SUN
workstations!
(Pauls-article-here(http://www.paulgraham.com/gh.html))
推荐答案
我已经使用Java七年了，切换到Common Lisp大约两年
年前，并报告了我的经验
我只能说他是对的Java。我不在乎别人怎么想。使用Common Lisp，我的工作效率更高，为什么我应该为
？
我对其他提到的语言不太了解
评论他们。
Pascal
-
可悲的是，社会和父母不知不觉地发布了童年的消息
，其他人知道什么是最好的。许多人都非常喜欢预期，并希望一些外部机构，权力或个人能够解决他们的问题。放弃期望甚至想要这个很难，
部分是因为留下的是自己和所有人的'b
限制。
乔尔克莱默，戴安娜阿尔斯塔德，大师论文 - 威权主义面具
I have used Java for seven years, switched to Common Lisp about two
years ago, and have reported my experience at
http://www.pascalcostanza.de/lisp/guide.html
All I can say is that he is right wrt Java. I don''t care what other
people think. I am so much more productive with Common Lisp, so why
should I?
I don''t know enough about the other mentioned languages to be able to
comment on them.
Pascal
--
Sadly, society and parents insidiously put out messages from childhood
on that others know what''s best. Many people are deeply conditioned to
expect and hope some outside agency, power or person will solve their
problems. Letting go of expectations or even wanting this is difficult,
partially because what one is left with is oneself and all of one''s
limitations.
Joel Kramer, Diana Alstad, The Guru Papers - Masks of Authoritarian Power
这是真的，PG提供了他的理由书。同样地，
他提供了Java如此受欢迎的原因（甚至无视Sun的
促销）。
作为对Java（以及大多数受欢迎的东西）的咆哮，我认为Alan Kay的
更有趣。它就在这里（对于那些使用Microsoft系统的人）
< http://murl.microsoft.com/LectureDetails.asp?1019>。第一个40美元左右的时间是关于槌球的，这对我来说非常感兴趣，但其余的是一个延伸的咆哮，关于多少
计算机科学自1980年以来，或者甚至可能是1970年以来，并且关于
，似乎很少有人关心。我的意思是什么是斯坦福教授用什么来教授Java？这不是教育，而是职业培训。
（同样的情绪在Croquet手册的附录中，但是它的价值不是很好玩作为实际的研讨会Q& A。）
[...]
That''s true, and PG offers reasons for that in his book. Similarly,
he offers reasons why Java is so popular (even ignoring Sun''s
promotion of it).
As a rant against Java (and most things popular) I thought Alan Kay''s
was more fun. It''s here (for those with Microsoft systems)
<http://murl.microsoft.com/LectureDetails.asp?1019>. The first 40
minutes or so is about Croquet, which strikes me as largely
uninteresting, but the remainder is an extended rant about how little
computer science has done since 1980, or perhaps even 1970, and about
how little anyone seems to care. I mean what''s Stanford doing
teaching Java? That''s not education, it''s vocational training.
(Similar sentiments are in an appendix of the Croquet manual, but it''s
not as fun as the actual seminar Q&A.)
[...]
哦不！在Slashdot上烤。
是的，那是一个真正的职业生涯。
很快我们将看到格雷厄姆坐在桥下，使用轮毂盖
用于镜子，同时试图用过期的信用卡刮胡子
他的边缘用粗糙的混凝土擦拭。
Oh no! Roasted on Slashdot.
Yep, that''s a real career-ender there.
Soon we will be seeing Graham sitting under a bridge, using a hubcap
for a mirror while trying to shave himself with an expired credit card
whose edge he whetted against rough concrete.
这篇关于你的大师保罗格雷厄姆在Slashdot上遭到惨败。的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持！