问题描述
我正在与一个赌博网站合作,该网站过去使用 ICRA词汇进行了标记用 RDF 和 PICS 标签.据我了解,这些标签是由 Internet Explorer 6 Content Advisor 阻止网站访问.
I'm working with a gambling website that historically has labeled itself using the ICRA Vocabulary expressed with RDF and PICS labeling. Its my understanding that these labels were interpreted by systems such as Internet Explorer 6 Content Advisor to block website access.
不幸的是, ICRA主页证明了ICRA的标签制度已经失效.
Unfortunately, the ICRA labeling scheme seems to be defunct as evidenced by the ICRA Homepage.
标签可能仍然有效,但是无法生成任何新的RDF文件.此外,PICS已被 POWDER 取代.
The labels might still work, but its not possible to generate any new RDF files. Additionally, PICS has been superseded by something called POWDER.
我的问题是:是否应该使用其他自标记方案来标识网站内容为包含语言,暴力,成人内容,潜在有害内容(例如赌博)等?像Netnanny和Cybersitter这样的产品是否需要这些方案,或者它们是否基于url白名单来阻止内容?
My question is: Are there other self-labeling schemes that should be used to identify website content as containing language, violence, adult content, potentially harmful content such as gambling etc? Do products like Netnanny and Cybersitter need these schemes, or do they block content based on url whitelists?
更新:我确实找到了一些可能的替代方法,但尚未评估它们的实用性:
Update:I did find some possible alternatives, but haven't yet assessed how useful they would be:
- SafeSurf is a rating system that covers various types of content
- RTALabel is a pretty coarse grained system that identifies sites as "Restricted to Adults"
推荐答案
以下是一些接受内容提供商自我识别的列表:
Here's a few lists that accept content provider self-identification:
- URL BlackList
- Shalla Lists
- OpenDNS Domain Tagging
- My Web of Trust
这篇关于对于网站的自我监管内容标记,ICRA是否有其他选择?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持!