问题描述
我知道许多方法来检查嵌套对象中是否存在 NullPointerException
,因为对于Java 8,最简单的方法是应用 Optional< param>
.或使用简单的if代码(例如
I know many ways how to check on nested objects for a NullPointerException
, as for Java 8 the simplest is to apply the Optional<param>
.or to use a simple if code such as
if(foo.bar() != null && foo.getBar().getObject()!=null){
foo.getBar().getObject().getWhatever();
}
好吧,我的问题是,在不知道内部类/方法名称的情况下,是否有一种简便的方法可以做到这一点
well my question is is there an easy way to do so in one method without knowing the names of the inner classes/methods
更清楚地说,我有一个像这样的代码
to be more clear i have a code which is like this
contract.getContactInfo().getPosition()
contract.getEntitledPerson().getEmail()
我想做一个这样的例子
excel.setCell(name1,contract.getContactInfo().getPosition());
excel.setCell(name2,contract.getEntitledPerson().getEmail());
如果它仅适用于2个嵌套对象或仅2个setter,但对于50个excel单元格(有时带有5或6个嵌套对象)而言,这是一个真正的噩梦
if its for only 2 nested objects or only 2 setters that's fine but get it for a 50 excel cells with sometimes 5 or 6 nested objects its a real nightmare to do so
可以说像setCell方法
something lets say like the setCell method
public setCell(String name,Object object){
return object; // make sure no nested object is null
}
我希望我的问题足够清楚.请记住,我不能简单地更改嵌套对象,因为其遗留代码已在很多地方使用!有什么想法吗?
i hope my question is clear enough. keep in mind i cant simply change the nested objects since its legacy code and being used in a lot of places! any ideas ?
推荐答案
正如您在问题中提到的那样,请使用 Optional
,但这更为宽松.
As you mentioned yourself in the question, use Optional
, but it's more lenghty.
excel.setCell(name1, Optional.of(contract).map(Contract::getContactInfo).map(ContactInfo::getPosition).orElse(null));
excel.setCell(name2, Optional.of(contract).map(Contract::getEntitledPerson).map(Person::getEmail).orElse(null));
像这样格式化时更容易阅读:
Which is more easily read when formatted like this:
excel.setCell(name1, Optional.of(contract)
.map(Contract::getContactInfo)
.map(ContactInfo::getPosition)
.orElse(null));
excel.setCell(name2, Optional.of(contract)
.map(Contract::getEntitledPerson)
.map(Person::getEmail)
.orElse(null));
如果您的目标是最小的代码,则只需捕获 NullPointerException
.在我看来,这有点骇人听闻,但是可以解决问题.
If your goal is smallest code, you could just catch the NullPointerException
. It's a bit of a hack, in my opinion, but it'll do the trick.
首先,一个辅助方法:
public static <T> T nullGuard(Supplier<T> supplier) {
try {
return supplier.get();
} catch (@SuppressWarnings("unused") NullPointerException ignored) {
return null;
}
}
然后包装有问题的表达式:
Then you wrapper the expression in question:
excel.setCell(name1, nullGuard(() -> contract.getContactInfo().getPosition()));
excel.setCell(name2, nullGuard(() -> contract.getEntitledPerson().getEmail()));
这篇关于嵌套对象空检查的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持!