It seems as though ${package.type} is being interpreted as a literal file extension rather than whatever the contents of the variable package.type, but I have no idea why; I am using the simplest possible build configuration! As far as I know, I don't have any weird sbt configurations lying around (or any at all -- I checked ~/.sbt, and I have tried running on multiple machines).推荐答案在 factorie_2.11-1.2-20151007.170205-28.pom><packaging>${package.type}</packaging>我想 sbt 使用此设置来获取工件.I suppose sbt uses this setting to get the artifact.在之前的 .pom 文件,它有:<packaging>jar</packaging>所以,也许这是一个损坏的构建.So, maybe it's a broken build. 这篇关于sbt 不解决依赖;路径正确,除了 ${package.type} 扩展名的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持! 10-27 15:44