问题描述
在继续努力避免对某些简单命令使用括号的过程中,我写下了以下运算符以创建新的图形窗口.我的问题是:除了明显无法在我的变量"newdev"上执行"not"功能以外,我是否有破坏" R中任何内容的风险?
In my continuing quest to avoid using parentheses for some simple commands, I wrote up the following operator to create a new graphics window. My question is: am I at risk of "breaking" anything in R, other than the obvious inability to execute the "not" function on my variable "newdev"?
# function to overload "!" for one purpose only
#this is adapted from the sos package code for "???", credited to Duncan Murdoch.
# Example of how to create a specialized unary operator that doesn't require
# parentheses for its argument. So far as I can tell,
#the only way to do this is to overload an existing function or
# operator which doesn't require parentheses. "?" and "!" meet this requirement.
`!` <- function (e1, e2) {
call <- match.call()
# match.call breaks out each callable function in argument list (which was "??foo" for the sos package "???",
# which allows topicExpr1 to become a list variable w/ callable function "!" (or "?" in sos)
original <- function() {
call[[1]]<-quote(base::`!`)
return(eval(call, parent.frame(2)))
}
# this does preclude my ever having an actual
# variable called "newdev" (or at least trying to create the actual NOT of it)
if(call[[2]] =='newdev') {
windows(4.5,4.5,restoreConsole=T)
}else{
return(original()) # do what "!" is supposed to do
}
}
推荐答案
我执行了"!" = function(a){stop("'NOT' is used")}
并执行了replications
函数,该函数使用!运算符,并且效果很好.因此,看起来可以安全地覆盖!".
I executed "!" = function(a){stop("'NOT' is used")}
and executed the replications
function, which uses the ! operator, and this worked fine. So it looks like it is safe to override "!".
您仍然可能想使用类,可以按照以下步骤进行操作:
Still you probably want to use classes, which you can do as follows:
# Create your object and set the class
A = 42
class(A) = c("my_class")
# override ! for my_class
"!.my_class" = function(v){
cat("Do wathever you want here. Argument =",v,"\n")
}
# Test ! on A
!A
这篇关于一元运算符超载:风险?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持!