问题描述
懒惰,Perl和Larry Wall
Xah Lee,20021124
在unix社区中存在相当大的混乱并且如意
思考懒惰这个词。在这篇文章中,我想做一些
澄清。
美国传统词典第三版将懒惰定义为:
a - 耐工作或劳累;处于闲散状态.a ??
当巫师拉里·沃尔说了一个?一个
程序员的三个主要优点是:懒惰,急躁和傲慢??,他用了这个词
a ?? lazinessa ??松散地暗示一种自然的倾向,导致成为经济学家。正如你现在所看到的那样,对工作或劳累有抵抗力?
显然不是积极的而不是美德,而是一种天生的性格
会产生经济性?如果是真的,那将是一件好事。
当拉里沃尔说一个程序员的美德是懒惰时,他想要让unix蠢货成为现实他们的大脑以下
命题为真:a?对工作或努力的抵抗是一种自然的人类b / b
处置和这种处置实际上导致行为是
economica ??。这种说法可能是真的,这意味着人类的懒惰可以从进化中直观地理解。然而,这个声明
是对所有人的一个命题,并不是一个美德?那个
可以应用于一群人,比如程序员。
煽动者拉里沃尔聪明地制造混乱与
一厢情愿。通过这样微妙的陈述,他半有意地混淆普通程序员认为可以不用彻底的b $ b,这是可以的,这是可以的,它是马虎的,它是可以贬低电脑
科学。 (就像那些无能的unixers和perlers一样)
你能不清楚地理解事物中的邪恶及其伤害吗?
Wall的懒惰引用是一个对计算机造成巨大损害
行业。它是其中一个来源,它引发了业界非常糟糕的时尚潮流和追逐。它比任何单一黑客或病毒更具破坏性。这是工作中的社交洗脑,比如钻石公司戴比尔斯非常成功的销售口号:a ?? A
钻石是Forevera?或者Apple的语法太棒了??想想
Differenta ??。
最基本的解释为什么拉里·沃尔的诡辩是
[免责声明:所有提到的真实人物只是意见。]
----
这篇文章存档于:
Xah
a ??
Laziness, Perl, and Larry Wall
Xah Lee, 20021124
In the unix community there''s quite a large confusion and wishful
thinking about the word laziness. In this post, i''d like to make some
clarifications.
American Heritage Dictionary third edition defines laziness as:
a??Resistant to work or exertion; disposed to idleness.a??
When the sorcerer Larry Wall said a??The three chief virtues of a
programmer are: Laziness, Impatience and Hubrisa??, he used the word
a??lazinessa?? to loosely imply a??natural disposition that results in being
economica??. As you can see now, a??Resistant to work or exertiona?? is
clearly not positive and not a virtue, but a??natural disposition that
results in economya?? is a good thing if true.
When Larry Wall said one of programer''s virtue is laziness, he wants
the unix morons to conjure up in their brains the following
proposition as true: a??Resistant to work or exertion is a natural human
disposition and such disposition actually results behaviors being
economica??. This statement may be true, which means that human laziness
may be intuitively understood from evolution. However, this statement
is a proposition on all human beings, and is not some a??virtuea?? that
can be applied to a group of people such as programers.
Demagogue Larry Wall is smart in creating a confusion combined with
wishful thinking. By making subtle statements like this, he semi-
intentionally confuses average programers to think that it is OK to be
not thorough, it is OK to be sloppy, it is OK to disparage computer
science. (like the incompetent unixers and perlers are)
Can you see the evil and its harm in not understanding things clearly?
This laziness quote by Wall is a tremendous damage to the computing
industry. It is a source among others that spurs much bad fashion
trends and fuckups in the industry. It is more damaging than any
single hack or virus. It is social brain-washing at work, like the
diamond company De Beers'' tremendously successful sales slogan: a??A
Diamond is Forevera?? or Apple''s grammatically fantastic a??Think
Differenta??.
The most fundamental explanation of why Larry Wall''s sophistry are
damaging to society is simply this: What he said is not true and they
are widely spread and conceived as worthwhile. This is a form of mis-
information. This is a manifestation of Love without Knowledge as i
expounded before, with subtle but disastrous consequences (already).
[DISCLAIMER: all mentions of real persons are opinion only.]
----
This post is archived at:
http://xahlee.org/UnixResource_dir/w..._laziness.html
Xah
xa*@xahlee.org
a?? http://xahlee.org/
推荐答案
根据定义编程是自动重复
操作以减少执行它们所需的人力所需的过程。一个好的
程序员遇到一个难题总是在寻找方法,通过将工作委托给计算机,使他的工作变得更轻松。这就是Larry
的意思。自动化比重复更有效。
-
Dan
我喜欢拉里·沃尔,尽管他不是Perl程序员,而且当他偷偷地给你一个b $ b颠覆美国人,新教徒的工作精神我喜欢他
甚至更好:)
I like Larry Wall, despite being not a Perl programmer, and when he
secretly subverts the american, protestant working ethos I like him
even better :)
这篇关于懒惰是一个程序员的美德吗?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持!