本文介绍了priority_queue声明和bool操作符<宣言的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

我的问题是:




  • 我有我的程序2类加主>

  • 我已在类的成员函数中声明了priority_queue;


  • 我认为应该使用的代码是:

      //确定优先级(在优先级队列中)
    bool operator< ; (const node& a,const node& b)
    {
    return a.getPriority()> b.getPriority();
    }




问题:我插入这段代码?

解决方案

这看起来像是你的运算符< 可能是对节点的一个不好的补充。问自己:节点是逻辑上可比的?很明显,比较节点(在priorty_queue的上下文之外)应该比较它们的优先级吗?也许它应该比较自己的位置,或任何他们可能包含的东西。如果你提供一个运算符< ,还有其他5个比较运算符也是有意义的。如果不清楚什么节点<节点实际上进行比较,不为节点提供运算符<。在这种情况下,最好为 priority_queue ...

提供自定义比较器。

  struct NodeComparer 
{
bool operator()(const node& left,const node& right)
{
return left.GetPriority() right.GetPriority();
}
}

...

  std :: priority_queue< node,std :: vector< node> ;, NodeComparer> nodeQueue; 

这样,您的 priority_queue 但您不会向节点添加不合逻辑的功能。


my problem is:

  • I have my program with 2 class plus the main;

  • I've declared a priority_queue inside a member function of a class;

  • I have to define the comparison and I think the code I should use is:

    // Determine priority (in the priority queue)
    bool operator < (const node & a, const node & b)
    {
      return a.getPriority() > b.getPriority();
    }
    

Question: where Should I insert this piece of code? Could someone help me?

thanks

解决方案

It looks like your operator< is possibly a poor addition to node. Ask yourself: are nodes logically comparable? Is it clear that comparing nodes (outside of the context of priorty_queue) should compare their priority? Maybe it should compare their position, or anything else they might contain. If you supply an operator< it will also make sense to have the other 5 comparison operators. If it's not clear what node < node actually compares, don't provide an operator< for nodes. In cases like this it's better to provide a custom comparer to the priority_queue...

struct NodeComparer
{
    bool operator()(const node& left, const node& right)
    {
        return left.GetPriority() > right.GetPriority();
    }
}

...

std::priority_queue<node, std::vector<node>, NodeComparer> nodeQueue;

This way your priority_queue can work as desired but you don't add illogical functionality to node.

这篇关于priority_queue声明和bool操作符&lt;宣言的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持!

10-27 00:23