问题描述
你知道吗，为什么微软甚至懒得花钱来挫败Linux
当它的顶级支持者就像这样的小丑一样......？！
新的OSI总裁下台
作者：Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols
2005年3月4日
OSI（开源倡议）是批准开源的机构
许可证。尼尔森是非营利组织的创始成员，也是基于
开源软件的高端电子邮件系统设计公司Crynwr Software的总裁。总统在2月1日。
他取代了OSI的联合创始人Eric Raymond，自该组织以来一直担任总统。建立。
在他的博客中，尼尔森说，我将辞去上周三开始的
开源计划的主席职务（2/23）。我已经等了
来宣布这个消息，因为公开承认不足之处并不容易。
" I毫不费力地告诉别人我是一个可怜的游泳运动员，但那是因为我不在乎游泳，所以对我来说是无价的。我非常在乎OSI拥有一位优秀的总统。我不喜欢政治，而且最近几周显而易见的是，OSI的角色已经迅速变得更加政治化了。尼尔森写道。
我还没准备好担任总统一职;当然不是通过训练
，甚至可能不是气质。整个董事会一致同意我们需要一位比我更具政治头脑的总统，他继续说道。
继续。
buffoonery如何与操作系统偏好相关联？
一个人的疯狂如何贬低操作系统？
你为什么要同时将它发布到linux和microsoft场地？
进出？
我们工程类型决定技术优势。
但是一般社会关注质量和这个人的意见。
OSI应该指定一个人/总统/谁是最糟糕的，持有种族主义观点，并且充其量，不成熟就发布了这样的废话......好吧，我能说什么呢？
一个人的疯狂如何贬低操作系统？
我们人类通过榜样表现......我们遵循我们尊重的人，我们走开了
来自我们不会...的人>
为什么要同时将它发布到linux和microsoft场所？
我想公开这个问题。
进/出？
我真的，真的很想...但是如果最高级别的OSS
和Linux层次结构允许种族主义者负责。
否先生，如果是这样的话，请指望我...
像往常一样有偏见的人，尼尔森'的心脏在正确的地方，
但是当他试图表达
时，他确实将他的腿放入他的肠道。
每个人都有偏见，这只是人性。这就是物品的价值，这是一种平衡的方法。人类的思维倾向于概括，以便掌握它没有足够的信息进行正确分类的事情。所以，在这方面，
每个人都有一定程度的偏见，这是不可避免的。这是可以原谅的。
不可原谅的是那些继续培养偏见的人，即使他们有足够的信息，他们也会提出意见和展望。
相反。
相反。
我不相信尼尔森属于后者类别，但我绝对肯定
相信他会陷入困境前者因为他显然没有足够的曝光和与黑人的互动，能够从任何有效的经验或知识中说出
。他的错误是他应该只是在这种背景下闭嘴。
取而代之的是，他的辞职可能在每个人的最好兴趣。
不是因为他说的话，而是因为他甚至在
所说的全部。
所有这些人都带着种族主义的呼喊。应该闭嘴。
他所说的一切都不是种族主义者。这是非常偏见的
，无知而不是恶意。
-
rapskat - 19:29:47 up 16：39,3位用户，平均负载：0.40,0.76,0.60
别担心，你的室友无法想象。
我在干扰素描&代码 - 现实
You know, why does Microsoft even bother to spend money to thwart Linux
when it''s top supporters act like such buffoons anyway...?!
http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759...0.asp#talkback
New OSI President Steps Down
By Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols
March 4, 2005
The OSI (Open Source Initiative) is the body that approves open-source
licenses. Nelson, a founding member of the nonprofit group and president
of Crynwr Software, a high-end e-mail system design company based on
open-source software, was named president on Feb. 1.
He took the place of Eric Raymond, a co-founder of the OSI, who had been
president since the organization''s founding.
In his Weblog, Nelson said, "I''m resigning from the presidency of the
Open Source Initiative, effective last Wednesday (2/23). I have waited
to make this announcement because it is not easy to admit inadequacy
publicly."
"I have no trouble telling people that I am a poor swimmer, but that is
of no matter to me since I don''t care about swimming. I care very much
that OSI have a good president. I don''t like politics, and it''s become
evident in recent weeks that OSI''s role has rapidly become much more
political," Nelson wrote.
"I am not ready for the position of president; certainly not by training
and perhaps not even by temperament. The entire board is unanimous in
agreeing that we need a president with more political savvy than I," he
continued.
How does buffoonery correlate with operating-system preference?
How does one individual''s nuttiness disparage an operating system?
And why do you post this to linux and microsoft venues simultaneously?
in or out?
We engineering types make decisions on technical merit.
But general society looks at the quality and opinions of the person.
The idea that OSI should appoint a person as /President/ who is at
worst, holding racist opinions, and at best, immature enough to post
such nonsense...well, what can I say ?
How does one individual''s nuttiness disparage an operating system?
We humans behave by example...we follow people we respect, we walk away
from people we don''t...
And why do you post this to linux and microsoft venues simultaneously?
I want this issue exposed in public.
in or out?
I really, really want to be in...but not if the highest levels of OSS
and the Linux hierarchy allow a racist to be in charge.
No sir, count me out if that is the case...
As usual with prejudiced persons, Nelson''s heart was in the right place,
but he really put his leg into his intestines when attempting to express
himself.
Everyone is prejudiced, this is just human nature. It''s the way things
are, sort of a method of balance. The human mind tends to
generalize in order to get a grasp on things that it doesn''t
have enough information to categorize properly. So, in this aspect,
everyone is prejudiced to some extent, unavoidably so. This is forgivable.
What is not forgivable is people who continue to foster prejudiced
opinions and outlooks even when they have enough information to the
contrary.
I don''t believe that Nelson is of the latter category, but I do definitely
believe he falls smack into the former in that he obviously does not have
enough exposure and interaction with black persons to be able to speak
from any valid experience or knowledge. His error was he should have just
kept his mouth shut in this context.
In lieu of this, his resignation is probably in everyone''s best interest.
Not so much because of what he said, but the fact that he even said it at
all.
And all of these people with their cries of "racism" should just shut up.
Nothing he stated was in the least "racist". It was very prejudicial
though, from ignorance rather than malice.
--
rapskat - 19:29:47 up 16:39, 3 users, load average: 0.40, 0.76, 0.60
Don''t worry so loud, your roommate can''t think.
I am jamming to Sketch & Code - Reality
这篇关于“黑人不懒惰”。 - 新的OSI总裁下台的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持！