我制作了一个小应用程序,其中Form
是线程化的(使用BackgroundWorker
),当我想退出时,以这种形式,我在QuitApplication
类中调用了Program
函数。DoWork
看起来像这样:
static void guiThread_DoWork(object sender, DoWorkEventArgs e)
{
BackgroundWorker worker = sender as BackgroundWorker;
while (true)
{
if (worker.CancellationPending == true)
{
e.Cancel = true;
break;
}
if (Program.instance.form != null)
{
Program.instance.form.UpdateStatus(Program.instance.statusText, Program.instance.statusProgress);
}
Thread.Sleep(GUI_THREAD_UPDATE_TIME);
}
}
在Form1类中,我将此方法附加到关闭窗口:
void Form1_FormClosed(object sender, FormClosedEventArgs e)
{
Program.instance.SetStatus("Closing down...", 0);
Program.QuitApplication();
}
因此,我要确保在我按窗口上的X时一切都退出。但是,
if( worker.CancellationPending == true )
从未命中...这为什么呢?QuitApplication看起来像这样:
public static void QuitApplication()
{
Program.instance.guiThread.CancelAsync();
Application.Exit();
}
我使用
guiThread.WorkerSupportsCancellation = true
最佳答案
CancelAsync
设置了CancellationPending
属性,但是随后您立即退出了应用程序,而没有让后台线程有机会检测到该问题并关闭它。您需要更改UI代码以等待后台线程完成。
就个人而言,当我编写这样的应用程序时,我使窗体关闭按钮的行为就像“取消”按钮,而不是立即退出。对于最终用户而言,这要安全得多。例如:
private void abortButton_Click(object sender, EventArgs e) {
// I would normally prompt the user here for safety.
worker.CancelAsync();
}
private void Form1_FormClosing(object sender, FormClosingEventArgs e) {
if(worker.IsBusy) {
// If we are still processing, it's not very friendly to suddenly abort without warning.
// Convert it into a polite request instead.
abortButton.PerformClick();
e.Cancel = true;
}
}
关于c# - CancelAsync是否正常工作?,我们在Stack Overflow上找到一个类似的问题:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/5702965/