我有一个非常基本的线程池代码。
它调用链接块队列中的工作对象池。
该代码只是通过回收工作对象来打印出输入数据。
我发现一致的死锁/冻结与以下内容:
public class throttleheapthreadpool{
private quoteworkerobject[] channels;
private LinkedBlockingQueue<quoteworkerobject> idlechannels;
public throttleheapthreadpool(int poolsize,int stocks){
channels=new quoteworkerobject[poolsize];
idlechannels=new LinkedBlockingQueue<quoteworkerobject>();
for(int i=1;i<poolsize;i++){
channels[i]=new quoteworkerobject(idlechannels);
idlechannels.add(channels[i]);//All WORKERS to Idle pool to start
}
}
public void execute(Integer quote){
quoteworkerobject current = null;
try {
//extract worker from pool
current = (quoteworkerobject)idlechannels.take();
current.put(quote);
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
}
}
class quoteworkerobject{
LinkedBlockingQueue<Integer> taskqueue=new LinkedBlockingQueue<Integer>();
Thread quotethread=null;
LinkedBlockingQueue<quoteworkerobject> idle=null;
@SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
public quoteworkerobject(LinkedBlockingQueue<quoteworkerobject> idlechannels){
this.idle=idlechannels;
Runnable r=new Runnable(){
public void run() {
insertquote();
}
};
quotethread=new Thread(r);
quotethread.start();//spawn a thread from the worker
}
public void put(Integer quote){
taskqueue.add(quote);
}
public void insertquote(){
try{
Integer thisquote=taskqueue.take();
idle.add(this);
}
catch(Exception ex){
}
}
}
public static void main(String[] args){
throttleheapthreadpool pool=new throttleheapthreadpool(5,200);
Random randomGenerator = new Random();
for(int node=0;node < 20;node++){
int d=randomGenerator.nextInt(5*200);
pool.execute(d);
}
}
}
该代码始终在第8次执行时冻结-此时
当前=(quoteworkerobject)idlechannels.take();
上面有什么问题?
最佳答案
这正是我(讨厌吗?)不喜欢使用此类代码的原因。您应该考虑使您/我们的生活更轻松,并编写代码,即使几个月后您也可以查看并加以证明:相应地命名变量,编写简短的文档或说明等。我花了25分钟的时间进行重构,因为我不知道发生了什么。
我添加了一个小的重构,还添加了一些断点,看一下代码-解释在里面。但是问题出在insertQuote方法中-它完成得太早了。
import java.util.Random;
import java.util.concurrent.LinkedBlockingQueue;
public class Pool {
private Worker[] workers;
private LinkedBlockingQueue<Worker> workerQueue;
/**
* Create a pool of 5 workers and a {@link LinkedBlockingQueue} to store them
*/
public Pool(int poolsize) {
//1. First you get here : you create a Pool of 5 Worker Threads and a Queue to store them
System.out.println("1.");
workers = new Worker[poolsize];
workerQueue = new LinkedBlockingQueue<Worker>();
for (int i = 0; i < poolsize; i++) {
//2. You instantiate 5 worker Threads and place each of them on the Queue
System.out.println("2.");
workers[i] = new Worker(workerQueue);
workerQueue.add(workers[i]);
}
}
public void execute(Integer quote) {
Worker current = null;
try {
// extract worker from pool
//6. Get a worker from the Queue
System.out.println("6.");
current = workerQueue.take();
current.put(quote);
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
}
}
/**
*
*
*/
class Worker {
LinkedBlockingQueue<Integer> taskqueueForEachWorker = new LinkedBlockingQueue<Integer>();
LinkedBlockingQueue<Worker> workerQueue = null;
public Worker(LinkedBlockingQueue<Worker> idlechannels) {
new Thread(new Runnable() {
@Override
public void run() {
//3. You call the insert quote method
System.out.println("3.");
insertquote();
}
}).start();
}
public void put(Integer quote) {
//7. Add a task for each Thread to do
System.out.println("7.");
taskqueueForEachWorker.add(quote);
}
//TODO The problem is here: After you execute this line : workerQueue.add(this); this method ends, NO MORE worker Threads are put on the queue,
// thus at point 6 you block, well because there are no more worker Threads an no one add them.
public void insertquote() {
try {
// 4. You try to take an Integer from the Pool of tasks from rach Thread, but there is nothing yet - it is empty, thus each Thread (worker)
// blocks here, waiting for a task
System.out.println("4.");
Integer thisquote = taskqueueForEachWorker.take(); // This will successed only after 7.
workerQueue.add(this);
} catch (Exception ex) {
}
}
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
Pool pool = new Pool(5);
Random randomGenerator = new Random();
for (int node = 0; node < 20; node++) {
int d = randomGenerator.nextInt(5 * 200);
System.out.println("5.");
pool.execute(d);
}
}
}
输出将是1。
2。
3。
4。
2。
3。
4。
2。
3。
4。
2。
3。
4。
2。
3。
4。
5,
6。
7。
5,
6。
7。
5,
6。
7。
5,
6。
7。
5,
6。
7。
5,
6。
看到最后一行是6。如果由于方法insertQuote退出而在此处阻塞,则队列现在为空,则所有工作线程都已被占用。
在我看来,由于您的工作线程每个都使用一个单独的队列,因此您应该实现“偷工作”模式或Deque。看看也。
关于java - LinkedBlockingQueue中的死锁(?),我们在Stack Overflow上找到一个类似的问题:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/11832770/