编译器在编译时是否无法获取指向派生类的指针并知道它具有基类? 根据以下测试,似乎不能。有关问题发生的位置,请参阅我的评论结尾。
如何使它工作?
std::string nonSpecStr = "non specialized func";
std::string const specStr = "specialized func";
std::string const nonTemplateStr = "non template func";
class Base {};
class Derived : public Base {};
class OtherClass {};
template <typename T> std::string func(T * i_obj)
{ return nonSpecStr; }
template <> std::string func<Base>(Base * i_obj)
{ return specStr; }
std::string func(Base * i_obj)
{ return nonTemplateStr; }
class TemplateFunctionResolutionTest
{
public:
void run()
{
// Function resolution order
// 1. non-template functions
// 2. specialized template functions
// 3. template functions
Base * base = new Base;
assert(nonTemplateStr == func(base));
Base * derived = new Derived;
assert(nonTemplateStr == func(derived));
OtherClass * otherClass = new OtherClass;
assert(nonSpecStr == func(otherClass));
// Why doesn't this resolve to the non-template function?
Derived * derivedD = new Derived;
assert(nonSpecStr == func(derivedD));
}
};
最佳答案
Derived * derivedD = new Derived;
assert(nonSpecStr == func(derivedD));
这不能像您期望的那样解析为非模板函数,因为这样做必须执行从
Derived *
到Base *
的转换。但是模板版本不需要此强制类型转换,从而导致后者在重载解析期间更好地匹配。要强制模板函数不同时匹配
Base
和Derived
,可以使用SFINAE拒绝这两种类型。#include <string>
#include <iostream>
#include <type_traits>
#include <memory>
class Base {};
class Derived : public Base {};
class OtherClass {};
template <typename T>
typename std::enable_if<
!std::is_base_of<Base,T>::value,std::string
>::type
func(T *)
{ return "template function"; }
std::string func(Base *)
{ return "non template function"; }
int main()
{
std::unique_ptr<Base> p1( new Base );
std::cout << func(p1.get()) << std::endl;
std::unique_ptr<Derived> p2( new Derived );
std::cout << func(p2.get()) << std::endl;
std::unique_ptr<Base> p3( new Derived );
std::cout << func(p3.get()) << std::endl;
std::unique_ptr<OtherClass> p4( new OtherClass );
std::cout << func(p4.get()) << std::endl;
}
输出:
non template function
non template function
non template function
template function
关于c++ - 为何模板函数无法将指向派生类的指针解析为指向基类的指针,我们在Stack Overflow上找到一个类似的问题:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/11910558/