我的自旋锁实现如下所示,我认为它不会引起任何数据争用,但是当我使用-fsanitize = thread测试我的代码时,它报告spin_unlock有写入数据争用。怎么会这样是误报吗?
#define barrier() asm volatile("": : :"memory")
#define cpu_relax() asm volatile("pause\n": : :"memory")
static inline void spin_lock(volatile int *lock) {
while (1)
{
int i = 0;
if (!atomic_swap(lock, EBUSY)) return;
while (*lock) {
i++;
if (i == 4000) {
i = 0;
thread_yield();
}
cpu_relax();
}
}
}
static inline void spin_unlock(volatile int *lock) {
barrier();
*lock = 0;
}
atomic_swap的功能如下:
static inline int atomic_swap(volatile void *lockword, int value) {
unsigned long tmp;
int result;
__asm__ __volatile__ ("dmb" : : : "memory");
__asm__ __volatile__("@ atomic_swap\n"
"1: ldrex %0, [%2]\n"
" strex %1, %3, [%2]\n"
" teq %1, #0\n"
" bne 1b"
: "=&r" (result), "=&r" (tmp)
: "r" (lockword), "Ir" (value)
: "cc");
__asm__ __volatile__ ("dmb" : : : "memory");
return result;
}
最佳答案
ThreadSanitizer不了解您自己生成的atomic_swap()
或barrier()
函数的语义。从ThreadSanitizer FAQ:
因此,它不知道atomic_swap()
应该做什么,并且不知道在ThreadSanitizer currently doesn't support memory fences之上。
关于c++ - ThreadSanitizer说我的spin_lock有数据争用,但是如何?,我们在Stack Overflow上找到一个类似的问题:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/36122580/