c - dlopen/dlsym/dlclose(dlfcn.h)导致内存泄漏

像这样使用dlfcn系列时：

#include <stdio.h>
#include <dlfcn.h>

typedef int(*timefunc_t)(void*);

int main()
{
    timefunc_t fun;
    void* handle;
    handle = dlopen("libc.so.6", RTLD_LAZY);
    fun = (timefunc_t)dlsym(handle, "time");
    printf("time=%d\n", fun(NULL));
    dlclose(handle);
    return 0;
}

它导致内存泄漏：

==28803== Memcheck, a memory error detector
==28803== Copyright (C) 2002-2010, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward et al.
==28803== Using Valgrind-3.6.1 and LibVEX; rerun with -h for copyright info
==28803== Command: ./dl
==28803==
time=1309249569
==28803==
==28803== HEAP SUMMARY:
==28803==     in use at exit: 20 bytes in 1 blocks
==28803==   total heap usage: 1 allocs, 0 frees, 20 bytes allocated
==28803==
==28803== LEAK SUMMARY:
==28803==    definitely lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==28803==    indirectly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==28803==      possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==28803==    still reachable: 20 bytes in 1 blocks
==28803==         suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==28803== Rerun with --leak-check=full to see details of leaked memory
==28803==
==28803== For counts of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -v
==28803== ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 13 from 6)

我的问题是，这是编程错误，还是dlfcn / libdl.so中的错误？

最佳答案

看起来像后者。但是，这似乎没什么大不了的，因为如果您重复dlopen / dlsym / dlclose调用另一个例程，您会发现内存泄漏的大小相同，并且不会随dlopen / dlclose调用的次数而增加。