我正在编写一个跟踪药物使用情况的软件。我正在使用JPA与数据库进行交互。我的模型由两个实体组成:Prescription
和Dose
。每个Prescription
都有一个Dose
实例的集合,这些实例代表此处方中给予患者的剂量,如下所示:
Prescription.java
@Entity
@XmlRootElement
public class Prescription {
private long id;
private Collection<Dose> doses = new ArrayList<Dose>();
/**
* Versioning field used by JPA to track concurrent changes.
*/
private long version;
// Other properties omitted...
@Id
@GeneratedValue(strategy = GenerationType.TABLE)
public long getId() {
return id;
}
public void setId(long id) {
this.id = id;
}
// We specify cascade such that when we modify this collection, it will propagate to the DOSE table (e.g. when
// adding a new dose to this collection, a corresponding record will be created in the DOSE table).
@OneToMany(mappedBy = "prescription", cascade = CascadeType.ALL)
public Collection<Dose> getDoses() {
// todo update to list or collection interface.
return doses;
}
public void setDoses(Collection<Dose> doses) {
this.doses = doses;
}
@Version
public long getVersion() {
return version;
}
/**
* Application code should not call this method. However, it must be present for JPA to function.
* @param version
*/
public void setVersion(long version) {
this.version = version;
}
}
Dose.java
@Entity
@XmlRootElement
public class Dose {
private long id;
private Prescription prescription;
// Other properties omitted...
@Id
@GeneratedValue(strategy = GenerationType.TABLE)
public long getId() {
return id;
}
public void setId(long id) {
this.id = id;
}
@XmlTransient
@ManyToOne
@JoinColumn(name = "PRESCRIPTION_ID") // Specifies name of column pointing back to the parent prescription.
public Prescription getPrescription() {
return prescription;
}
public void setPrescription(Prescription prescription) {
this.prescription = prescription;
}
}
Dose
只能存在于Prescription
的上下文中,因此,通过将Dose
添加到其处方的剂量集合中,可以将addDose(long)
间接插入数据库中:DoseService.java
@Stateless
public class DoseService {
@PersistenceContext(unitName = "PrescriptionUnit")
private EntityManager entityMgr;
/**
* Insert a new dose for a given prescription ID.
* @param prescriptionId The prescription ID.
* @return The inserted {@code Dose} instance if insertion was successful,
* or {@code null} if insertion failed (if there is currently no doses available for the given prescription ID).
*/
@TransactionAttribute(value = TransactionAttributeType.REQUIRED)
public Dose addDose(long prescriptionId) {
// Find the prescription.
Prescription p = entityMgr.find(Prescription.class, prescriptionId);
if (p == null) {
// Invalid prescription ID.
throw new IllegalArgumentException("Prescription with id " + prescriptionId + " does not exist.");
}
// TODO is this sufficient locking?
entityMgr.lock(p, LockModeType.OPTIMISTIC_FORCE_INCREMENT);
Dose d = null;
if (isDoseAvailable(p)) {
// A dose is available, create it and insert it into the database.
d = new Dose();
// Setup the link between the new dose and its parent prescription.
d.setPrescription(p);
p.getDoses().add(d);
}
try {
// Flush changes to database.
entityMgr.flush();
return d;
} catch (OptimisticLockException ole) {
// Rethrow application-managed exception to ensure that caller will have a chance of detecting failure due to concurrent updates.
// (OptimisticLockExceptions can be swallowed by the container)
// See "Recovering from Optimistic Failures" (page 365) in "Pro JPA 2" by M. Keith and M. Schincariol for details.
throw new ChangeCollisionException();
}
}
/**
* Checks if a dose is available for a given prescription.
* @param p The prescription for which to look up if a dose is available.
* @return {@code true} if a dose is available, {@code false} otherwise.
*/
@TransactionAttribute(value = TransactionAttributeType.MANDATORY)
private boolean isDoseAvailable(Prescription p) {
// Business logic that inspects p.getDoses() and decides if it is safe to give the patient a dose at this time.
}
}
addDose(long)
可以被同时调用。在确定是否有剂量时,业务逻辑将检查处方的剂量集合。如果同时修改此集合(例如,通过并发调用LockModeType.OPTIMISTIC_FORCE_INCREMENT
),则事务将失败。我使用addDose
实现了这一点(而不是在DOSE表上获取表锁)。在Pro JPA 2 by Keith and Schincariol中,我读到:写锁保证了乐观读锁的所有功能,但是
还保证增加交易中的版本字段
无论用户是否更新了实体。 [...]
使用OPTIMISTIC_FORCE_INCREMENT的常见情况是为了保证
实体关系更改之间的一致性(通常是
在对象中时与目标外键一对多关系
建模实体关系指针改变,但是在数据模型中
实体表中的任何列均未更改。
我对这种锁定模式的理解正确吗?我当前的策略是否可以确保如果处方药剂量集合发生任何变化(无论是增加,删除还是更新该剂量集合中的任何剂量),ojit_code事务处理都会失败吗?
最佳答案
似乎正确。
但是,我建议先进行测试...更简单的方法是通过调试...使用您喜欢的IDE,在语句后设置一个调试点:
entityMgr.lock(p, LockModeType.OPTIMISTIC_FORCE_INCREMENT);
稍后,尝试从两个不同的客户端调用您的
addDose(prescriptionId)
,提供相同的prescriptionID ...,然后让一个客户端先完成操作,然后看看另一个客户端发生了什么。