list - 用语义等效的cats功能替换scalaz ListT

cats not是否提供ListT monad转换器，那么我们如何才能将以下scalt_a改写为对猫中语义上等效的片段使用scalaz ListT

import scalaz._
import ListT._
import scalaz.std.option._

val seeds: Option[List[String]] = Some(List("apple", "orange", "tomato"))
def grow(seed: String): Option[List[String]] = Some(List(seed.toUpperCase))
def family(seed: String, plant: String): Option[List[(String, String)]] = Some(List(seed -> plant))

(for {
  seed    <- listT(seeds)
  plant   <- listT(grow(seed))
  result  <- listT(family(seed, plant))
} yield result).run

这是我尝试使用flatMap和snippet的尝试

import cats.implicits._

seeds
  .flatMap {
    _.flatTraverse { seed =>
      grow(seed)
        .flatMap {
          _.flatTraverse { plant =>
            family(seed, plant)
          }
        }
    }
  }

这种重构似乎可以满足类型检查器的要求，但是我不确定快乐的编译器是否可以确保100％的语义等效性。

最佳答案

Cats不提供ListT，因为它违反了Monad的关联律。参见Cats FAQ和associated proof using scalaz ListT。

您建议的以下基于ListT的.flatTraverse实现仍然通过了所有猫核心法律测试(错误？)。

我没有软件测试方面的经验，但是您可能会发现成功的测试足够好，可以认为这两种实现是等效的。

ListT实现

case class ListT[M[_], A](value: M[List[A]])
implicit def listTMonad[M[_]: Monad] = new Monad[ListT[M, *]] {
  override def flatMap[A, B](fa: ListT[M, A])(f: A => ListT[M, B]): ListT[M, B] =
    ListT(
      Monad[M].flatMap[List[A], List[B]](fa.value)(
        list => Traverse[List].flatTraverse[M, A, B](list)(a => f(a).value)
      )
    )
  override def pure[A](a: A): ListT[M, A] = ListT(Monad[M].pure(List(a)))
  // unsafe impl, can be ignored for this question
  override def tailRecM[A, B](a: A)(f: A => ListT[M, Either[A, B]]): ListT[M, B] =
    flatMap(f(a)) {
      case Right(b) => pure(b)
      case Left(nextA) => tailRecM(nextA)(f)
    }
}

sbt

name := "listT_tests"
version := "0.1"
scalaVersion := "2.11.12"

scalacOptions += "-Ypartial-unification"

libraryDependencies ++= Seq(
  "org.typelevel" %% "cats-core" % "2.0.0",
  "org.scalaz" %% "scalaz-core" % "7.2.30",
  "org.scalacheck" %% "scalacheck" % "1.14.1" % "test",
  "org.scalatest" %% "scalatest" % "2.2.6" % "test",
  "org.typelevel" %% "discipline-scalatest" % "1.0.1",
  "org.typelevel" %% "discipline-core" % "1.0.2",
  "org.typelevel" %% "cats-laws" % "2.0.0" % Test,
  "com.github.alexarchambault" %% "scalacheck-shapeless_1.14" % "1.2.3" % Test
)

addCompilerPlugin("org.typelevel" %% "kind-projector" % "0.11.0" cross CrossVersion.full)

法律测试

class TreeLawTests extends AnyFunSpec with Checkers with FunSpecDiscipline {

  implicit def listTEq[M[_], A] = Eq.fromUniversalEquals[ListT[M, A]]
  checkAll("ListT Monad Laws", MonadTests[ListT[Option, *]].stackUnsafeMonad[Int, Int, String])
}

法律测试结果

- monad (stack-unsafe).ap consistent with product + map
- monad (stack-unsafe).applicative homomorphism
- monad (stack-unsafe).applicative identity
- monad (stack-unsafe).applicative interchange
- monad (stack-unsafe).applicative map
- monad (stack-unsafe).applicative unit
- monad (stack-unsafe).apply composition
- monad (stack-unsafe).covariant composition
- monad (stack-unsafe).covariant identity
- monad (stack-unsafe).flatMap associativity
- monad (stack-unsafe).flatMap consistent apply
- monad (stack-unsafe).flatMap from tailRecM consistency
- monad (stack-unsafe).invariant composition
- monad (stack-unsafe).invariant identity
- monad (stack-unsafe).map flatMap coherence
- monad (stack-unsafe).map2/map2Eval consistency
- monad (stack-unsafe).map2/product-map consistency
- monad (stack-unsafe).monad left identity
- monad (stack-unsafe).monad right identity
- monad (stack-unsafe).monoidal left identity
- monad (stack-unsafe).monoidal right identity
- monad (stack-unsafe).mproduct consistent flatMap
- monad (stack-unsafe).productL consistent map2
- monad (stack-unsafe).productR consistent map2
- monad (stack-unsafe).semigroupal associativity
- monad (stack-unsafe).tailRecM consistent flatMap

关于list - 用语义等效的cats功能替换scalaz ListT，我们在Stack Overflow上找到一个类似的问题：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/60244629/