我有一个包含3个文档的索引。
{
"firstname": "Anne",
"lastname": "Borg",
}
{
"firstname": "Leanne",
"lastname": "Ray"
},
{
"firstname": "Anne",
"middlename": "M",
"lastname": "Stone"
}
当我搜索“Anne”时,我希望Elastic返回所有这3个文档(因为它们在一定程度上都与“Anne”相匹配)。但是,我希望Leanne Ray的得分(相关性排名)较低,因为搜索词“Anne”在该文档中的出现位置比在其他两个文档中出现的要晚。
最初,我使用的是ngram标记器。我的索引映射中还有一个生成的字段,称为“full_name”,其中包含名字,中间名和姓氏字符串。当我搜索“Anne”时,所有3个文档都在结果集中。但是,安妮·斯通(Anne M Stone)与莱安·雷(Leanne Ray)得分相同。安妮·斯通(Ann M Stone)的得分应该比莱安(Leanne)高。
为了解决这个问题,我将我的ngram标记器更改为edge_ngram标记器。这具有将Leanne Ray从结果集中完全删除的效果。我们希望将此结果保留在结果集中-因为它仍然包含查询字符串-但得分比其他两个更好的匹配要低。
我在某处读到,可能在同一索引中将边缘ngram过滤器与ngram过滤器一起使用。如果是这样,我应该如何重新创建索引呢?有更好的解决方案吗?
这是初始索引设置。
{
"settings": {
"analysis": {
"analyzer": {
"my_analyzer": {
"filter": [
"lowercase"
],
"type": "custom",
"tokenizer": "my_tokenizer"
}
},
"tokenizer": {
"my_tokenizer": {
"token_chars": [
"letter",
"digit",
"custom"
],
"custom_token_chars": "'-",
"min_gram": "3",
"type": "ngram",
"max_gram": "4"
}
}
}
},
"mappings": {
"properties": {
"contact_id": {
"type": "text",
"fields": {
"keyword": {
"type": "keyword",
"ignore_above": 256
}
}
},
"firstname": {
"type": "text",
"fields": {
"keyword": {
"type": "keyword"
}
},
"copy_to": [
"full_name"
]
},
"lastname": {
"type": "text",
"fields": {
"keyword": {
"type": "keyword"
}
},
"copy_to": [
"full_name"
]
},
"middlename": {
"type": "text",
"fields": {
"keyword": {
"type": "keyword",
"ignore_above": 256
}
},
"copy_to": [
"full_name"
]
},
"full_name": {
"type": "text",
"analyzer": "my_analyzer",
"fields": {
"keyword": {
"type": "keyword"
}
}
}
}
}
}
这是我的查询
{
"query": {
"bool": {
"should": [
{
"query_string": {
"query": "Anne",
"fields": [
"full_name"
]
}
}
]
}
}
}
这带来了这些结果
"hits": {
"total": {
"value": 3,
"relation": "eq"
},
"max_score": 0.59604377,
"hits": [
{
"_index": "contacts_15",
"_type": "_doc",
"_id": "3",
"_score": 0.59604377,
"_source": {
"firstname": "Anne",
"lastname": "Borg"
}
},
{
"_index": "contacts_15",
"_type": "_doc",
"_id": "1",
"_score": 0.5592099,
"_source": {
"firstname": "Anne",
"middlename": "M",
"lastname": "Stone"
}
},
{
"_index": "contacts_15",
"_type": "_doc",
"_id": "2",
"_score": 0.5592099,
"_source": {
"firstname": "Leanne",
"lastname": "Ray"
}
}
]
}
如果我改用边缘ngram标记器,则索引的设置如下所示:
{
"settings": {
"max_ngram_diff": "10",
"analysis": {
"analyzer": {
"my_analyzer": {
"filter": [
"lowercase"
],
"type": "custom",
"tokenizer": ["edge_ngram_tokenizer"]
}
},
"tokenizer": {
"edge_ngram_tokenizer": {
"token_chars": [
"letter",
"digit",
"custom"
],
"custom_token_chars": "'-",
"min_gram": "2",
"type": "edge_ngram",
"max_gram": "10"
}
}
}
},
"mappings": {
"properties": {
"contact_id": {
"type": "text",
"fields": {
"keyword": {
"type": "keyword",
"ignore_above": 256
}
}
},
"firstname": {
"type": "text",
"fields": {
"keyword": {
"type": "keyword"
}
},
"copy_to": [
"full_name"
]
},
"lastname": {
"type": "text",
"fields": {
"keyword": {
"type": "keyword"
}
},
"copy_to": [
"full_name"
]
},
"middlename": {
"type": "text",
"fields": {
"keyword": {
"type": "keyword",
"ignore_above": 256
}
},
"copy_to": [
"full_name"
]
},
"full_name": {
"type": "text",
"analyzer": "my_analyzer",
"fields": {
"keyword": {
"type": "keyword"
}
}
}
}
}
}
而同一查询将带回此新结果集...
"hits": {
"total": {
"value": 2,
"relation": "eq"
},
"max_score": 1.5131824,
"hits": [
{
"_index": "contacts_16",
"_type": "_doc",
"_id": "3",
"_score": 1.5131824,
"_source": {
"firstname": "Anne",
"middlename": "M",
"lastname": "Stone"
}
},
{
"_index": "contacts_16",
"_type": "_doc",
"_id": "1",
"_score": 1.4100108,
"_source": {
"firstname": "Anne",
"lastname": "Borg"
}
}
]
}
最佳答案
您可以继续使用ngram(即第一个解决方案),但随后您需要更改查询以提高相关性。它的工作方式是在multi_match
子句中添加增强的should
查询,以增加其名字或姓氏与输入完全匹配的文档的分数:
{
"query": {
"bool": {
"must": [
{
"query_string": {
"query": "Anne",
"fields": [
"full_name"
]
}
}
],
"should": [
{
"multi_match": {
"query": "Anne",
"fields": [
"firstname",
"lastname"
],
"boost": 10
}
}
]
}
}
}
该查询将
Anne Borg
和Anne M Stone
带到Leanne Ray
之前。更新
这是我得出结果的方式。
首先,我使用创建了一个测试索引,与您添加到问题中的设置/映射完全相同:
PUT test
{ ... copy/pasted mappings/settings ... }
然后,我添加了您提供的三个示例文档:
POST test/_doc/_bulk
{"index":{}}
{"firstname":"Anne","lastname":"Borg"}
{"index":{}}
{"firstname":"Leanne","lastname":"Ray"}
{"index":{}}
{"firstname":"Anne","middlename":"M","lastname":"Stone"}
最后,如果您在上面运行我的查询,则会得到以下结果,这正是您期望的结果(看分数):
{
"hits" : {
"total" : {
"value" : 3,
"relation" : "eq"
},
"max_score" : 5.1328206,
"hits" : [
{
"_index" : "test",
"_type" : "_doc",
"_id" : "4ZqbDHIBhYuDqANwQ-ih",
"_score" : 5.1328206,
"_source" : {
"firstname" : "Anne",
"lastname" : "Borg"
}
},
{
"_index" : "test",
"_type" : "_doc",
"_id" : "45qbDHIBhYuDqANwQ-ih",
"_score" : 5.0862665,
"_source" : {
"firstname" : "Anne",
"middlename" : "M",
"lastname" : "Stone"
}
},
{
"_index" : "test",
"_type" : "_doc",
"_id" : "4pqbDHIBhYuDqANwQ-ih",
"_score" : 0.38623023,
"_source" : {
"firstname" : "Leanne",
"lastname" : "Ray"
}
}
]
}
}
关于elasticsearch - 如何在Elasticsearch索引中同时使用ngram和Edge ngram标记器?,我们在Stack Overflow上找到一个类似的问题:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/61747380/