python - Numpy.dot错误？ NaN行为不一致

当涉及到numpy.dot和零时，我注意到nan中的行为不一致。

有人能理解吗？这是一个错误吗？这特定于dot函数吗？

我正在使用在Linux上运行的numpy v1.6.1(64位)(也在v1.6.2上进行了测试)。我还在Windows 32位的v1.8.0上进行了测试(因此我无法确定差异是由于版本，操作系统还是体系结构引起的)。

from numpy import *
0*nan, nan*0
=> (nan, nan)  # makes sense

#1
a = array([[0]])
b = array([[nan]])
dot(a, b)
=> array([[ nan]])  # OK

#2 -- adding a value to b. the first value in the result is
#     not expected to be affected.
a = array([[0]])
b = array([[nan, 1]])
dot(a, b)
=> array([[ 0.,  0.]])  # EXPECTED : array([[ nan,  0.]])
# (also happens in 1.6.2 and 1.8.0)
# Also, as @Bill noted, a*b works as expected, but not dot(a,b)

#3 -- changing a from 0 to 1, the first value in the result is
#     not expected to be affected.
a = array([[1]])
b = array([[nan, 1]])
dot(a, b)
=> array([[ nan,   1.]])  # OK

#4 -- changing shape of a, changes nan in result
a = array([[0],[0]])
b = array([[ nan, 1.]])
dot(a, b)
=> array([[ 0.,  0.], [ 0.,  0.]])  # EXPECTED : array([[ nan,  0.], [ nan,  0.]])
# (works as expected in 1.6.2 and 1.8.0)

情况＃4在v1.6.2和v1.8.0中似乎正常工作，但在情况＃2中不起作用...

编辑:@seberg指出这是一个blas问题，所以这是我通过运行from numpy.distutils.system_info import get_info; get_info('blas_opt')找到的关于blas安装的信息:

1.6.1 linux 64bit
/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/numpy/distutils/system_info.py:1423: UserWarning:
    Atlas (http://math-atlas.sourceforge.net/) libraries not found.
    Directories to search for the libraries can be specified in the
    numpy/distutils/site.cfg file (section [atlas]) or by setting
    the ATLAS environment variable.
  warnings.warn(AtlasNotFoundError.__doc__)
{'libraries': ['blas'], 'library_dirs': ['/usr/lib'], 'language': 'f77', 'define_macros': [('NO_ATLAS_INFO', 1)]}

1.8.0 windows 32bit (anaconda)
c:\Anaconda\Lib\site-packages\numpy\distutils\system_info.py:1534: UserWarning:
   Blas (http://www.netlib.org/blas/) sources not found.
   Directories to search for the sources can be specified in the
   numpy/distutils/site.cfg file (section [blas_src]) or by setting
   the BLAS_SRC environment variable.
 warnings.warn(BlasSrcNotFoundError.__doc__)
{}

(我个人不知道该怎么做)

最佳答案

我认为，正如seberg所建议的那样，这与所使用的BLAS库有关。如果查看numpy.dot的实现方式here和here，您会发现对 double matrix-times-matrix情况的调用cblas_dgemm()。

该C程序(复制了一些示例)在使用“普通” BLAS时给出相同的输出，而在使用ATLAS时给出正确的答案。

#include <stdio.h>
#include <math.h>

#include "cblas.h"

void onebyone(double a11, double b11, double expectc11)
{
  enum CBLAS_ORDER order=CblasRowMajor;
  enum CBLAS_TRANSPOSE transA=CblasNoTrans;
  enum CBLAS_TRANSPOSE transB=CblasNoTrans;
  int M=1;
  int N=1;
  int K=1;
  double alpha=1.0;
  double A[1]={a11};
  int lda=1;
  double B[1]={b11};
  int ldb=1;
  double beta=0.0;
  double C[1];
  int ldc=1;

  cblas_dgemm(order, transA, transB,
              M, N, K,
              alpha,A,lda,
              B, ldb,
              beta, C, ldc);

  printf("dot([ %.18g],[%.18g]) -> [%.18g]; expected [%.18g]\n",a11,b11,C[0],expectc11);
}

void onebytwo(double a11, double b11, double b12,
              double expectc11, double expectc12)
{
  enum CBLAS_ORDER order=CblasRowMajor;
  enum CBLAS_TRANSPOSE transA=CblasNoTrans;
  enum CBLAS_TRANSPOSE transB=CblasNoTrans;
  int M=1;
  int N=2;
  int K=1;
  double alpha=1.0;
  double A[]={a11};
  int lda=1;
  double B[2]={b11,b12};
  int ldb=2;
  double beta=0.0;
  double C[2];
  int ldc=2;

  cblas_dgemm(order, transA, transB,
              M, N, K,
              alpha,A,lda,
              B, ldb,
              beta, C, ldc);

  printf("dot([ %.18g],[%.18g, %.18g]) -> [%.18g, %.18g]; expected [%.18g, %.18g]\n",
         a11,b11,b12,C[0],C[1],expectc11,expectc12);
}

int
main()
{
  onebyone(0, 0, 0);
  onebyone(2, 3, 6);
  onebyone(NAN, 0, NAN);
  onebyone(0, NAN, NAN);
  onebytwo(0, 0,0, 0,0);
  onebytwo(2, 3,5, 6,10);
  onebytwo(0, NAN,0, NAN,0);
  onebytwo(NAN, 0,0, NAN,NAN);
  return 0;
}

使用BLAS的输出:

dot([ 0],[0]) -> [0]; expected [0]
dot([ 2],[3]) -> [6]; expected [6]
dot([ nan],[0]) -> [nan]; expected [nan]
dot([ 0],[nan]) -> [0]; expected [nan]
dot([ 0],[0, 0]) -> [0, 0]; expected [0, 0]
dot([ 2],[3, 5]) -> [6, 10]; expected [6, 10]
dot([ 0],[nan, 0]) -> [0, 0]; expected [nan, 0]
dot([ nan],[0, 0]) -> [nan, nan]; expected [nan, nan]

ATLAS输出:

dot([ 0],[0]) -> [0]; expected [0]
dot([ 2],[3]) -> [6]; expected [6]
dot([ nan],[0]) -> [nan]; expected [nan]
dot([ 0],[nan]) -> [nan]; expected [nan]
dot([ 0],[0, 0]) -> [0, 0]; expected [0, 0]
dot([ 2],[3, 5]) -> [6, 10]; expected [6, 10]
dot([ 0],[nan, 0]) -> [nan, 0]; expected [nan, 0]
dot([ nan],[0, 0]) -> [nan, nan]; expected [nan, nan]

当第一个操作数具有NaN时，BLAS似乎具有预期的行为，而当第一个操作数为零而第二个操作数具有NaN时，BLAS则具有错误的行为。

无论如何，我认为此错误不在Numpy层中；在BLAS中。似乎可以通过使用ATLAS来解决。

以上是在Ubuntu 14.04上使用Ubuntu提供的gcc，BLAS和ATLAS生成的。

关于python - Numpy.dot错误？ NaN行为不一致，我们在Stack Overflow上找到一个类似的问题：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/23374524/