我们有一个应用程序,它从数据流中读取并将这些信息向上插入数据库。数据是发生在Google云端硬盘上的更改,这意味着影响相同对象的许多事件可能彼此之间非常接近。
将这些信息上传到数据库时,我们陷入了僵局,这是日志中显示的内容。我已经重建并清理了查询的可读性:
ERROR: deadlock detected
DETAIL: Process 10586 waits for ShareLock on transaction 166892743; blocked by process 10597.
Process 10597 waits for ShareLock on transaction 166892741; blocked by process 10586.
Process 10586:
INSERT INTO documents
(version, source, source_id, ingestion_date)
VALUES
(0, 'googledrive', 'alpha', '2017-09-21T07:03:51.074Z'),
(0, 'googledrive', 'beta', '2017-09-21T07:03:51.074Z')
(0, 'googledrive', 'gamma', '2017-09-21T07:03:51.074Z'),
(0, 'googledrive', 'delta', '2017-09-21T07:03:51.074Z'),
(0, 'googledrive', 'epsilon', '2017-09-21T07:03:51.074Z'),
(0, 'googledrive', 'zeta', '2017-09-21T07:03:51.074Z')
ON CONFLICT (source, source_id)
DO UPDATE
SET
ingestion_date = EXCLUDED.ingestion_date,
version = documents.version + 1
RETURNING source_id, source, uid
Process 10597:
INSERT INTO documents
(version, source, source_id, ingestion_date)
VALUES
(0, 'googledrive', 'delta', '2017-09-21T07:03:51.167Z'),
(0, 'googledrive', 'gamma', '2017-09-21T07:03:51.167Z')
ON CONFLICT (source, source_id)
DO UPDATE
SET
ingestion_date = EXCLUDED.ingestion_date,
version = documents.version + 1
RETURNING source_id, source, uid
HINT: See server log for query details.
CONTEXT: while locking tuple (3908269,11) in relation "documents"
STATEMENT:
INSERT INTO documents
(version, source, source_id, ingestion_date)
VALUES
(0, 'googledrive', 'alpha', '2017-09-21T07:03:51.074Z'),
(0, 'googledrive', 'beta', '2017-09-21T07:03:51.074Z'),
(0, 'googledrive', 'gamma', '2017-09-21T07:03:51.074Z'),
(0, 'googledrive', 'delta', '2017-09-21T07:03:51.074Z'),
(0, 'googledrive', 'epsilon', '2017-09-21T07:03:51.074Z'),
(0, 'googledrive', 'zeta', '2017-09-21T07:03:51.074Z')
ON CONFLICT (source, source_id)
DO UPDATE
SET
ingestion_date = EXCLUDED.ingestion_date,
version = documents.version + 1
RETURNING source_id, source, uid
模式:
Column | Type | Modifiers
----------------+-----------------------------+-------------------------------------------------------------------
uid | uuid | not null default gen_random_uuid()
date_created | timestamp without time zone | not null default now()
sequence_id | bigint | not null default nextval('documents__sequence_id__seq'::regclass)
version | integer | not null default 0
source | text | not null
source_id | text | not null
ingestion_date | timestamp without time zone | not null
Indexes:
"documents__pkey" PRIMARY KEY, btree (uid)
"documents__sequence_id__unique" UNIQUE CONSTRAINT, btree (sequence_id)
"documents__source__source_id__deleted" UNIQUE, btree (source, source_id)
"documents__ingestion_date__idx" btree (ingestion_date)
"documents__source_id__source__idx" btree (source_id, source)
我怀疑问题是这样的:“第一个事务按顺序锁定了具有source_id alpha,beta,gamma的行,而第二个事务按相反的顺序锁定了具有source_id delta,gamma的行,并且死锁发生在它们都锁定了“ Gamma 和增量”,但是这里的时机非常紧张!
对此的解决方案是什么?按source_id对值列表进行排序?
最佳答案
我可以想到三种解决方案:
我更喜欢第三个解决方案,除非错误经常发生。
关于postgresql - Postgres在并发更新中陷入僵局,我们在Stack Overflow上找到一个类似的问题:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/46366324/