我有一个由两列expiredtype_id分隔的表。
expired是一个布尔值,按范围划分。
表格示例:

mos_active_1
...
mos_active_15
mos_expired_1
...
mos_expired_15

我的约束设置如下:
ADD CONSTRAINT mos_active_1_check CHECK (expired = false AND type_id < 100 )
...
ADD CONSTRAINT mos_expired_1_check CHECK (expired = true AND type_id < 100 )

如果我现在运行一个type_id所有的工作都像预期的那样,只需点击SELECT * from mos WHERE expired = true AND type_id = 34
Result  (cost=0.00..19.77 rows=2 width=627)
  ->  Append  (cost=0.00..19.77 rows=2 width=627)
        ->  Seq Scan on mos  (cost=0.00..11.50 rows=1 width=627)
              Filter: (expired AND (type_id = 34))
        ->  Index Scan using index_mos_expired_1_on_type_id_and_region_id on mos_expired_1 mos  (cost=0.00..8.27 rows=1 width=627)
              Index Cond: (type_id = 34)
              Filter: expired

完全不工作。mos_expired_1表示同时查询SELECT * from mos WHERE expired = false AND type_id = 34EXPLAIN
Result  (cost=0.00..2464.71 rows=5863 width=150)
  ->  Append  (cost=0.00..2464.71 rows=5863 width=150)
        ->  Seq Scan on mos  (cost=0.00..11.50 rows=1 width=627)
              Filter: ((NOT expired) AND (type_id = 34))
        ->  Index Scan using index_mos_expired_1_on_type_id_and_region_id on mos_expired_1 mos  (cost=0.00..8.27 rows=1 width=627)
              Index Cond: (type_id = 34)
              Filter: (NOT expired)
        ->  Bitmap Heap Scan on mos_active_1 mos  (cost=113.68..2444.95 rows=5861 width=150)
              Recheck Cond: (type_id = 34)
              Filter: (NOT expired)
              ->  Bitmap Index Scan on index_mos_active_1_on_type_id  (cost=0.00..112.22 rows=5861 width=0)
                    Index Cond: (type_id = 34)

complete SQL(除了实际的mos表创建之外)
我真的很想知道我是否遗漏了什么,或者这是一个查询计划问题。
更新:我用一个简单得多的例子重现了同样的问题,只有两个表有一个基于expired的约束:
CREATE TABLE mos (type_id   INTEGER UNIQUE, expired boolean);
CREATE TABLE mos_expired_1 ( CHECK ( expired = true  ) ) INHERITS (mos);
CREATE TABLE mos_active_1 ( CHECK ( expired = false ) ) INHERITS (mos);
INSERT INTO mos_expired_1 (type_id,expired) VALUES(1, true);
INSERT INTO mos_active_1 (type_id,expired) VALUES(2, false);
EXPLAIN SELECT * from mos where expired = false;
EXPLAIN SELECT * from mos where expired = true;

最佳答案

看起来在PostgreSQL中,布尔值的约束排除不起作用。当您使用integerenum时,它工作良好。
整数:

CREATE TABLE mos (type_id INTEGER UNIQUE, expired int);
CREATE TABLE mos_expired_1 ( CHECK ( expired = 0 ) ) INHERITS (mos);
CREATE TABLE mos_active_1 ( CHECK ( expired = 1 ) ) INHERITS (mos);
INSERT INTO mos_expired_1 (type_id,expired) VALUES(1, 0);
INSERT INTO mos_active_1 (type_id,expired) VALUES(2, 1);
analyze;

EXPLAIN SELECT * from mos where expired = 0;
                                 QUERY PLAN
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Result  (cost=0.00..37.76 rows=12 width=8)
   ->  Append  (cost=0.00..37.76 rows=12 width=8)
         ->  Seq Scan on mos  (cost=0.00..36.75 rows=11 width=8)
               Filter: (expired = 0)
         ->  Seq Scan on mos_expired_1 mos  (cost=0.00..1.01 rows=1 width=8)
               Filter: (expired = 0)
(6 rows)

EXPLAIN SELECT * from mos where expired = 1;
                                 QUERY PLAN
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Result  (cost=0.00..37.76 rows=12 width=8)
   ->  Append  (cost=0.00..37.76 rows=12 width=8)
         ->  Seq Scan on mos  (cost=0.00..36.75 rows=11 width=8)
               Filter: (expired = 1)
         ->  Seq Scan on mos_active_1 mos  (cost=0.00..1.01 rows=1 width=8)
               Filter: (expired = 1)
(6 rows)

枚举:
CREATE TYPE mybool AS ENUM ('true', 'false');
CREATE TABLE mos (type_id INTEGER UNIQUE, expired mybool);
CREATE TABLE mos_expired_1 ( CHECK ( expired = 'true' ) ) INHERITS (mos);
CREATE TABLE mos_active_1 ( CHECK ( expired = 'false' ) ) INHERITS (mos);
INSERT INTO mos_expired_1 (type_id,expired) VALUES(1, 'true');
INSERT INTO mos_active_1 (type_id,expired) VALUES(2, 'false');
analyze;

EXPLAIN SELECT * from mos where expired = 'true';
                                 QUERY PLAN
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Result  (cost=0.00..37.76 rows=12 width=8)
   ->  Append  (cost=0.00..37.76 rows=12 width=8)
         ->  Seq Scan on mos  (cost=0.00..36.75 rows=11 width=8)
               Filter: (expired = 'true'::mybool)
         ->  Seq Scan on mos_expired_1 mos  (cost=0.00..1.01 rows=1 width=8)
               Filter: (expired = 'true'::mybool)
(6 rows)

EXPLAIN SELECT * from mos where expired = 'false';
                                 QUERY PLAN
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Result  (cost=0.00..37.76 rows=12 width=8)
   ->  Append  (cost=0.00..37.76 rows=12 width=8)
         ->  Seq Scan on mos  (cost=0.00..36.75 rows=11 width=8)
               Filter: (expired = 'false'::mybool)
         ->  Seq Scan on mos_active_1 mos  (cost=0.00..1.01 rows=1 width=8)
               Filter: (expired = 'false'::mybool)
(6 rows)

我不知道是不是虫子。我想在任何地方都没有记录。

关于postgresql - PostgreSQL分区约束行为异常,我们在Stack Overflow上找到一个类似的问题:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/2331446/

10-09 08:48