在几年前编写的一个Web服务器项目中,我偶尔会感到很奇怪,并且-在我看来-不可能NullPointerException
。
它在实用程序方法中发生,用于在控制台上记录输出。
这是该方法的错误摘录:
try {
Encoder encoder = Base64.getEncoder();
if(logWriter != null) {
logWriter.write(String.valueOf(System.currentTimeMillis()));
logWriter.write(" ");
logWriter.write(String.valueOf(level));
logWriter.write(" ");
logWriter.write(encoder.encodeToString(Thread.currentThread().getName().getBytes()).replaceAll("(?:\\r\\n|\\n\\r|\\n|\\r)", ""));
logWriter.write(" ");
logWriter.write(encoder.encodeToString(log.getBytes()).replaceAll("(?:\\r\\n|\\n\\r|\\n|\\r)", ""));
logWriter.write("\r\n");
logWriter.flush();
}
lastWriterActivity = System.currentTimeMillis();
} catch (IOException e) {
println("Failed to write log to file: " + e, Color.RED);
try {
logWriter.close();
} catch (IOException e1) {
println("### Possible resource leak; unable to close log writer", Color.RED);
}
logWriter = null;
}
其中
logWriter
是BufferedWriter
。 NPE被引发在调用catch
的第一个logWriter.close()
块中。但是:当logWriter是
IOException
时,如何在try
块中抛出!= null
? Base64.getEncoder()
不能抛出IOException
,并且没有其他代码可以执行。这是我的堆栈跟踪:
Exception in thread "connection_0:0:0:0:0:0:0:1@1544725509" java.lang.NullPointerException
at org.jpuzzle.main.Logger.write(Logger.java:347)
at org.jpuzzle.main.Logger.verbose(Logger.java:187)
at org.jpuzzle.protocol.http.HttpRequest.onRequest(HttpRequest.java:1090)
at org.jpuzzle.network.ConnectionListener$Connection.proceed(ConnectionListener.java:438)
at org.jpuzzle.network.ConnectionListener$Connection.run(ConnectionListener.java:408)
我的方法是
synchronized
,因此互斥应该没有任何困难,而且我不知道为什么会发生这种情况。 最佳答案
简短答案:
重写您的catch
块,以避免NullPointerException
try {
if(logWriter != null) {
logWriter.close();
}
} catch (IOException e1) {
println("### Possible resource leak; unable to close log writer", Color.RED);
}
长答案:
是的,logWriter是静态的。
不同步是否会阻止方法并行执行方法?
没有。
需要证明吗?
运行此代码:
public class NowImFeelingZombified {
static Object logWriter = new Object();
public static void main(String[] args) {
final NowImFeelingZombified zombie1 = new NowImFeelingZombified();
final NowImFeelingZombified zombie2 = new NowImFeelingZombified();
Thread t1 = new Thread("zombie1 ") {
@Override
public void run() {
zombie1.syncedMethod();
}
};
Thread t2 = new Thread("zombie2 ") {
@Override
public void run() {
zombie2.syncedMethod();
}
};
t1.start();
t2.start();
}
private synchronized void syncedMethod() {
try {
System.out.println(Thread.currentThread().getName() + logWriter.toString());
Thread.sleep(2000L);
System.out.println(Thread.currentThread().getName() + logWriter.toString());
logWriter = null;
}
catch (InterruptedException e) {
}
}
}
输出是这样的:
zombie1 java.lang.Object@1c34796b
zombie2 java.lang.Object@1c34796b
zombie1 java.lang.Object@1c34796b
Exception in thread "zombie2 " java.lang.NullPointerException
at NowImFeelingZombified.syncedMethod(NowImFeelingZombified.java:44)
豪萨
同步方法将获得对该方法的调用者的锁定。含义
t1
不在乎t2
(当然也不在乎logWriter
)。而已。在这里阅读full story。
另外,很久以前,我为我一直使用的Util类编写了这样的5衬里。它使我免于编写
catch
块来关闭Closeables
public static void close(Closeable closeable) {
if (closeable != null) {
try {
closeable.close();
}
catch (IOException e) {
//logging
}
}
}
无论如何,Java 1.7引入了您可能想探索的
AutoCloseable
(由BufferedWriter
实现)。