AtomicReference就是以原子方式更新对象引用,可以看看源码:

private static final long serialVersionUID = -1848883965231344442L;

    private static final Unsafe unsafe = Unsafe.getUnsafe();
    private static final long valueOffset;

    static {
        try {
            valueOffset = unsafe.objectFieldOffset
                (AtomicReference.class.getDeclaredField("value"));
        } catch (Exception ex) { throw new Error(ex); }
    }

    private volatile V value;

    /**
     * Creates a new AtomicReference with the given initial value.
     *
     * @param initialValue the initial value
     */
    public AtomicReference(V initialValue) {
        value = initialValue;
    }

    /**
     * Creates a new AtomicReference with null initial value.
     */
    public AtomicReference() {
    }

    /**
     * Gets the current value.
     *
     * @return the current value
     */
    public final V get() {
        return value;
    }

可以看出它是利用unsafe类提供的方法来进行的,

使用场景,当两个线程同时去更新数据库内容,那么就会存在问题

假设a先执行,b后执行,操作变量a就会造成问题,

方法一,在执行sql的时候带上原来就有的值:

update set money =#{value} where id=#{id} and money=#{oldValue}

那么你更新时候就不会出现同时更新,

再看另一种方法案例:

package com.cxy.ssp.Automic;

import java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicReference;

public class Demo2 {
    private static AtomicReference<Integer> atomicReference =new AtomicReference<>(0);

    public static void main(String[] args) {
        atomicReference.compareAndSet(0,1);
        System.out.println(atomicReference.get());
        atomicReference.compareAndSet(1,3);
        System.out.println(atomicReference.get());

        atomicReference.compareAndSet(1,5);
        System.out.println(atomicReference.get());
    }


}
02-12 20:36