我有一个简单的结构,loc
typedef struct
{
long blk;
int offset;
} loc;
在函数avl_isnadd中,它按以下方式传递:
int
avl_isnadd (old_loc, old_isn, isn)
loc *old_loc;
int old_isn, isn;
{
int next_isn;
loc *this_loc;
printf("\n{avl_isnadd} - old_loc-> blk = %d, old_loc->offset = %d\n", old_loc->blk, old_loc->offset);
this_loc->blk = old_loc->blk;
this_loc->offset = old_loc->offset;
printf("\n{avl_isnadd} - this_loc->blk = %d, this_loc->offset = %d\n", this_loc->blk, this_loc->offset);
next_isn = avl_isnget (this_loc);
return next_isn;
}
在avl_isnget中,我们有:
int
avl_isnget (myLoc)
loc *myLoc;
{
printf("\n{avl_isnget} - MyLoc->blk = %d, myLoc->offset = %d\n", myLoc->blk, myLoc->offset);
return 0;
}
控制台上的结果是:
{avl_isnadd} - old_loc-> blk = 1, old_loc->offset = 512
{avl_isnadd} - this_loc->blk = 1, this_loc->offset = 512
{avl_isnget} - MyLoc->blk = 1485457792, myLoc->offset = 512
我在这里想念什么?我不明白为什么avl_isnget应该有
myLoc-> blk的其他值
最佳答案
您没有为this_loc
分配任何空间,因此,一旦执行this_loc->blk = old_loc->blk;
,便会调用undefined behavior。您可以在自动存储中或从堆中为this_loc
分配空间。我将演示自动存储选项,因为考虑到所提供的代码(使用更新的语法),我发现这样做是更可取的:
自动存储选项:
int
avl_isnadd (loc *old_loc, int old_isn, int isn)
{
int next_isn;
loc this_loc; // don't make it a pointer. this declaration will allocate space for
// the struct in automatic storage (in many implementations,
// the stack) whose scope exists only in this function
printf("\n{avl_isnadd} - old_loc-> blk = %ld, old_loc->offset = %d\n", old_loc->blk, old_loc->offset); // printf uses the %ld specifier for a signed long
this_loc.blk = old_loc->blk; // change the accessor operator from -> to .
this_loc.offset = old_loc->offset;
printf("\n{avl_isnadd} - this_loc.blk = %ld, this_loc.offset = %d\n", this_loc.blk, this_loc.offset);
next_isn = avl_isnget (this_loc); // Simply pass the entire struct to the avl_isnget function.
return next_isn;
// this_loc goes out of scope (pops off the stack) and you're done with it
}
然后将
avl_isnget
函数更改为int
avl_isnget (loc myLoc)
{
// myLoc is now a local copy of the this_loc struct that you passed in.
// Since this function doesn't modify the struct loc passed in, there's
//no real point in passing in a pointer. A local copy will do just fine for printing
printf("\n{avl_isnget} - MyLoc.blk = %ld, myLoc.offset = %d\n", myLoc.blk, myLoc.offset);
return 0;
}
另一个选择是将空间分配为
loc* this_loc = malloc(sizeof(loc));
并从那里开始,但是使用所提供的代码,没有理由这样做。除非您有good reason to do so,否则避免进行内存管理。关于c - C指针行为无法理解,我们在Stack Overflow上找到一个类似的问题:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/46100594/