我不太了解如何在类中正确存储订阅者,以使它们持久化,但又不阻止对象被初始化。这是一个不会取消初始化对象的示例:

import UIKit
import Combine

class Test {
    public var name: String = ""

    private var disposeBag: Set<AnyCancellable> = Set()

    deinit {
        print("deinit")
    }

    init(publisher: CurrentValueSubject<String, Never>) {
        publisher.assign(to: \.name, on: self).store(in: &disposeBag)
    }
}

let publisher = CurrentValueSubject<String, Never>("Test")

var test: Test? = Test(publisher: publisher)
test = nil


当我将assign替换为sink(在其中我正确声明了[weak self])时,它实际上确实可以正确初始化(可能是因为assign以导致问题的方式访问self)。

例如,在使用.assign时如何防止强引用循环?

谢谢

最佳答案

您可以将其.asign(to :)替换为接收器,其关闭中的[weak self]会破坏内存循环。在Playground尝试一下,看看有什么不同

final class Bar: ObservableObject {
    @Published var input: String = ""
    @Published var output: String = ""

    private var subscription: AnyCancellable?

    init() {
        subscription = $input
            .filter { $0.count > 0 }
            .map { "\($0) World!" }
            //.assignNoRetain(to: \.output, on: self)
            .sink { [weak self] (value) in
                self?.output = value
        }

    }

    deinit {
        subscription?.cancel()
        print("\(self): \(#function)")
    }
}

// test it!!
var bar: Bar? = Bar()
let foo = bar?.$output.sink { print($0) }
bar?.input = "Hello"
bar?.input = "Goodby,"
bar = nil

它打印
Hello World!
Goodby, World!
__lldb_expr_4.Bar: deinit

所以我们没有内存泄漏!

终于在forums.swift.org上,有人做了一个很好的小东西
extension Publisher where Self.Failure == Never {
    public func assignNoRetain<Root>(to keyPath: ReferenceWritableKeyPath<Root, Self.Output>, on object: Root) -> AnyCancellable where Root: AnyObject {
        sink { [weak object] (value) in
        object?[keyPath: keyPath] = value
    }
  }
}

关于swift - 使用苹果公司的新Combine框架时如何防止强引用周期(.assign引起问题),我们在Stack Overflow上找到一个类似的问题:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/57980476/

10-13 04:53