c - 如何使用malloc声明变量会导致位丢失？

首先，我运行valgrind以确保（在默认设置下）零错误。然后，我决定使用类似以下内容的检查泄漏：--leak-check=full

我有看起来像char* variable=malloc(sizeof(char)*(strlen(in)+1));的代码，并且valgrind报告内存“肯定丢失”。

我可以访问的唯一另一行代码（在库回调函数中）是声明in的代码行。这是类型为void *的函数参数（尽管在这种情况下，我希望我们可以放心地假定该值以null终止）。

最佳答案

有

#include <stdlib.h>

char * G;

int main()
{
   char * l = malloc(10);

   G = malloc(20);
}

valgrind下的执行给出：

pi@raspberrypi:/tmp $ valgrind --leak-check=full ./a.out
==11087== Memcheck, a memory error detector
==11087== Copyright (C) 2002-2017, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward et al.
==11087== Using Valgrind-3.13.0 and LibVEX; rerun with -h for copyright info
==11087== Command: ./a.out
==11087==
==11087==
==11087== HEAP SUMMARY:
==11087==     in use at exit: 30 bytes in 2 blocks
==11087==   total heap usage: 2 allocs, 0 frees, 30 bytes allocated
==11087==
==11087== 10 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 1 of 2
==11087==    at 0x4847568: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:299)
==11087==    by 0x10453: main (mm.c:7)
==11087==
==11087== LEAK SUMMARY:
==11087==    definitely lost: 10 bytes in 1 blocks
==11087==    indirectly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==11087==      possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==11087==    still reachable: 20 bytes in 1 blocks
==11087==         suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==11087== Reachable blocks (those to which a pointer was found) are not shown.
==11087== To see them, rerun with: --leak-check=full --show-leak-kinds=all
==11087==
==11087== For counts of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -v
==11087== ERROR SUMMARY: 1 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 6 from 3)

malloc(10)绝对丢失，因为在执行结束时无法访问它（此处不在main内）

malloc(20)不会丢失，因为仍然可以通过G到达

关于c - 如何使用malloc声明变量会导致位丢失？，我们在Stack Overflow上找到一个类似的问题：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/54734454/