我已经看到了将SupervisorJob
传递给CoroutineScope
的教程,以避免在子例程之一失败时所有协程作业被取消。
在run3
中,我认为将SupervisorJob
传递给launch
可以获得相同的结果,但显然没有。似乎允许协程在出现异常的情况下被重用(如果您从SupervisorJob
中删除launch
,则第二个run2
调用将不会运行协程作业),但是它的行为不像supervisorScope
,后者的其他子级作业可以继续(在示例中,第一个test1.run
调用)。我想知道在什么情况下可以使用这种方式?因为将它传递给launch
构造函数看起来很合法。
package coroutine.exceptions
import kotlinx.coroutines.*
fun log(msg: String) = println("$msg (${Thread.currentThread().name})")
val logExceptionHandler = CoroutineExceptionHandler { _, e ->
log(e.localizedMessage)
}
fun main() = runBlocking {
TestReuseCoroutineAfterException4("test1").run {
run1(true)
delay(100)
println()
run1(false)
delay(100)
}
println("================================================================")
TestReuseCoroutineAfterException4("test2").run {
run2(true)
delay(100)
println()
run2(false)
delay(100)
}
println("================================================================")
TestReuseCoroutineAfterException4("test3").run {
run3(true)
delay(100)
println()
run3(false)
delay(100)
println()
}
log("finished")
}
class TestReuseCoroutineAfterException4(
private val testName: String
) : CoroutineScope by CoroutineScope(CoroutineName(testName)) {
// by passing a Job, we can let the exception propagate to this coroutine scope instead of the
// root one, which allows us to reuse the root scope.
fun run1(throwException: Boolean) = launch(logExceptionHandler + Job()) {
val logPrefix = "$testName.run1:"
coroutineScope {
launch {
launch {
if (throwException)
throw RuntimeException("$logPrefix throw exception")
else
log("$logPrefix done (job#1-1)")
}.join()
launch {
log("$logPrefix done (job#1-2)")
}.join()
log("$logPrefix done (job#1)")
}.join()
launch {
log("$logPrefix done (job#2)")
}.join()
}
}
suspend fun run2(throwException: Boolean) {
val logPrefix = "$testName.run2:"
supervisorScope {
launch(logExceptionHandler) {
launch {
if (throwException)
throw Exception("$logPrefix throw exception")
else
log("$logPrefix done (job#1-1)")
}.join()
launch {
log("$logPrefix done (job#1-2)")
}.join()
log("$logPrefix done (job#1)")
}.join()
// this will be run.
launch {
log("$logPrefix done (job#2)")
}.join()
}
}
fun run3(throwException: Boolean) {
val logPrefix = "$testName.run3:"
launch(logExceptionHandler + SupervisorJob()) {
launch {
launch {
if (throwException)
throw Exception("$logPrefix throw exception")
else
log("$logPrefix done (job#1-1)")
}.join()
launch {
log("$logPrefix done (job#1-2)")
}.join()
log("$logPrefix done (job#1)")
}.join()
// this will still be run.
launch {
log("$logPrefix done (job#2)")
}.join()
}
}
}
输出
test1.run1: throw exception (DefaultDispatcher-worker-2 @test1#2)
test1.run1: done (job#1-1) (DefaultDispatcher-worker-2 @test1#7)
test1.run1: done (job#1-2) (DefaultDispatcher-worker-2 @test1#8)
test1.run1: done (job#1) (DefaultDispatcher-worker-2 @test1#6)
test1.run1: done (job#2) (DefaultDispatcher-worker-2 @test1#9)
================================================================
test2.run2: throw exception (main @coroutine#10)
test2.run2: done (job#2) (main @coroutine#12)
test2.run2: done (job#1-1) (main @coroutine#14)
test2.run2: done (job#1-2) (main @coroutine#15)
test2.run2: done (job#1) (main @coroutine#13)
test2.run2: done (job#2) (main @coroutine#16)
================================================================
test3.run3: throw exception (DefaultDispatcher-worker-2 @test3#18)
test3.run3: done (job#1-1) (DefaultDispatcher-worker-4 @test3#22)
test3.run3: done (job#1-2) (DefaultDispatcher-worker-4 @test3#23)
test3.run3: done (job#1) (DefaultDispatcher-worker-4 @test3#21)
test3.run3: done (job#2) (DefaultDispatcher-worker-4 @test3#24)
finished (main @coroutine#1)
Process finished with exit code 0
最佳答案
此行为的原因不是您要传递SupervisorJob
,而是要向其传递任何类型的Job
。尝试用+ SupervisorJob()
替换+ Job()
,第二次调用run2()
将执行协程。
主要区别在于,当您将显式作业传递给launch
时,它将成为已启动协程的父级作业,而不是TestReuseCoroutineAfterException4
中的主作业。因此,协程失败不会取消主作业,并且效果只限于一次调用。
不建议将工作直接传递给launch
,因为这会破坏结构化并发并创建您遇到的怪异语义。
关于kotlin - 我们什么时候使用launch(Supervisor Job())?,我们在Stack Overflow上找到一个类似的问题:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/60026116/