通常,我写这样的代码:
//definition
exports.getReply = function * (msg){
//...
return reply;
}
//usage
var msg = yield getReply ('hello');
但是如何在es6类中编写和使用生成器?我尝试了这个:
class Reply{
*getReply (msg){
//...
return reply;
}
*otherFun(){
this.getReply(); //`this` seem to have no access to `getReply`
}
}
var Reply = new Reply();
Reply.getReply(); //out of class,how can I get access to `getReply`?
我也尝试过:
class Reply{
getReply(){
return function*(msg){
//...
return reply;
}
}
}
这两种方法似乎都是错误的答案。那么如何在类中正确编写生成器函数呢?
最佳答案
编辑:添加更多示例。
您的class
定义(几乎)是正确的。错误是在实例化var Reply = new Reply();
中。这将尝试重新定义分配给类名称的变量。此外,generator
函数还需要对yield
进行编码。我详细说明了一些OP代码以显示工作示例。
class Reply {
//added for test purpose
constructor(...args) {
this.args = args;
}
* getReply(msg) {
for (let arg in this.args) {
let reply = msg + this.args[arg];
//generator should yield something
yield reply;
}
//next call returns (yields) {done:true,value:undefined}
}
* otherFun() {
yield this.getReply('Nice to meet you '); //yields Generator object
yield this.getReply('See you '); //Yes, this can access
//next call yields {done:true, value:undefined}
}
* evenMore() {
yield* this.getReply('I miss you '); //yields generator result(s)
yield* this.getReply('I miss you even more ');
}
}
//now test what we have
const reply = new Reply('Peter', 'James', 'John');
//let and var here are interchangeable because of Global scope
var r = reply.getReply('Hello ');
var msg = r.next(); //{done:false,value:"..."}
while (!msg.done) {
console.log(msg.value);
msg = r.next();
}
var other = reply.otherFun();
var o = other.next(); //{done:false,value:Generator}
while (!o.done) {
let gen = o.value;
msg = gen.next();
while (!msg.done) {
console.log(msg.value);
msg = gen.next();
}
o = other.next();
}
var more = reply.evenMore();
msg = more.next();
while (!msg.done) {
console.log(msg.value);
msg = more.next();
}
//update of 1/12/2019
//more examples
for (let r of reply.getReply('for ')) {
console.log(r);
}
for (let r of reply.evenMore()) {
console.log(r);
}
//note that the following doesn't work because of lack of star (*) inside the generator function
for (let r of reply.otherFun()) {
console.log(r);
}
更新2019年1月12日
正如@BugBuddy所建议的那样,
for..of
循环看起来更好(但并非在所有情况下都有效)。查看摘要中的更新行。