Hou-chan v. uncle Murphy fighting over

Hou-chan v. uncle Murphy fighting over the inheritance Hou door lawsuit for the first time to sit in a diagramCase development to the present, Mr. Hou Yaohua their responsibility and, if all the problems have been implemented to the written word, and will not appear on today's Hermes Watches problems. From a legal standpoint, Mr. Hou Yaohua should take care of things the outset, signed an agreement with Hou-chan as a basis to establish a word, but this is likely to do it? Which family to do so? Really do so, the family would not be called home!In short, the case is a moral and legal game, the resolution of a rational state of understanding. Examines each person's moral conscience, personality, character, including everyone of us here yesterday 14:00, both the original defendant to enter the courtroom, the court hearing on time. Yaowen daughter Hou-chan cattle Chengzhi, the second defendant and third defendant Guo small to appear in court in person. Hou-chan sister said Murphy did not show up the first defendant, after the death of his father, Murphy first time, rushed to his father live in the Rose Garden, presided over the funeral, and actual control of all the heritage of the Rose Garden. The behest of cattle into aiming Murphy, removed his father under the name of the bank large sums of money. The Guo couple the use of private vehicles and moving company, has taken away all the items of the Rose Garden Villa, 800 square meters of the entire villa looted In addition, friends and family sent Roger Dubuis Watches gifts 30 million and Yaowen apprentice for the purchase of cemetery grant of about 300,000, also charged by Murphy et al. Hou-chan sisters said they were Yaowen the legal successor of the heritage that others do not possess, dispose of any of its heritage. The defendant without his consent the unauthorized disposition should be shown with the return of the whole of the estate, which is a trial of its statutory obligations, Murphy's lawyer claims that, Hou-chan the facts. Withdrawal and use of funds, Hou-chan is informed, more than 130 million deposit for processing Yaowen debt matters. Murphy also spent 1.08 million Yaowen construction of the cemetery, in addition to 170,000 disciples donations, the rest are Murphy funded. In this regard, the plaintiffs point out, Murphy repair the family cemetery, and personal behavior Murphy's lawyer, to take custody Yaowen living items, because Yaowen has not buried, talk about the distribution of the estate is not yet reality the end of the trial, due to both divergence, the court no longer do the work of mediation, the court will choose a sentencing Murphy's lawyer, said the nation has its laws and family rules, the rules of the Hou is the death of a loved one year after sub-heritage. But in Yaowen during the funeral, Hou-chan on many occasions away Yaowen living items, as well as the continuous presence of the idea of ??the estate, but Murphy ignored. Hou-chan also took some people to the coffee shop, ask the views of the sub-heritage, the presence of said niu as a minor should be given a larger share of the lawyers said, in April 2008, Railway Art Troupe Yaowen ready commemoration of the first anniversary of the death. Hou-chan issued a lawyer's letter, said that all things involving Yaowen required Hou-chan, Hou-chan themselves as sole heir. In May of that year, Hou-chan to Murphy texting, require the borrower to 600,000 for costs abroad. Murphy seek Yaowen apprentice opinion, not to lend money to her. A month later, Hou-chan and her daughter lost in Yaowen ashes card in the name, to the cemetery for a new card ashes. Murphy holds the ashes that becomes a piece of paper, he will not be able to remove the completion of the younger brother's ashes buried, There are greater things than this, I do not know whether you can understand the the Murphy grief?Murphy's lawyer, said thus Murphy and Hou-chan relationship changes, and stop to pay the loan Yaowen Villa Hou-chan was withdrawn before the hearing, Guo Degang 3 of the testimony of witnesses, court witnesses and the testimony of witnesses has remained mysterious. In yesterday's trial, witnesses finally lifted the veil. Yesterday, Hou-chan party fails to provide any testimony of witnesses the Murphy party witnesses to appear and the testimony of witnesses in a Murphy party provided testimony from one of Hao Jie (sound), to prove Hou-chan has some of the items taken away from the Rose Garden Villa. According to Hao Jie readme, her 78-year-old adopted daughter Hou Baolin, grew up Hou parents, had in Yaowen a funeral during help. Murphy's lawyer, said Hao Jie frail elderly and sick, unable to personally appear in court Hao Jie said she gave Hou-chan took an imported male table, a crystal glasses, white jade and a thumb. Another time, Hou-chan down from the second floor, holding more than a foot long package to see me, she is very scared, and then the package on the car taken away. I do not know Murphy was how do you know Hou-chan to get something, and said how do you not care, I'm asking you to take care of, Hao Jie To this end, and Murphy said she had a fight Hao Jie said, after finishing the funeral, Hou-chan has three came home in Tianjin, asked her home Yaowen things, and rummaging through her family turned over and over, Hou-chan's lawyer, said Hao Jie said there is no basis, and Hou-chan went to her home The rummaging nor common sense. Hou-chan's lawyer also raised Hao Jie testimony Movado Watches of the notary is done during the day yesterday, the doctor-patient proved last night. Foresee know her disease in advance to do the notarization that make sense? She is the agent deliberately arranged, refused to appear. The lawyer said.