该代码具有两个简化的向下迭代器Cit
和It
。It
公开继承自Cit
,以允许像foo2中一样从It
转换为Cit
。
我以为It
将从int operator-(const self_type& other) const
继承Cit
。但事实并非如此。为什么?
如果我使用using operator-;
,那会使It
继承operator-
的两个Cit
方法吗?那是错误的。
测试:
#include <vector>
template<typename C>
class Cit {
typedef Cit<C> self_type;
public:
Cit(const C& container, const int ix)
: container_(&container), ix_(ix) {}
self_type operator-(const int n) const {
return self_type(*container_, ix_ - n);
}
int operator-(const self_type& other) const {
return ix_ - other.ix_;
}
const int& operator*() const { return (*container_)[ix_]; }
protected:
const C* container_;
int ix_;
};
template<typename C>
class It : public Cit<C> {
typedef Cit<C> Base;
typedef It<C> self_type;
public:
It(C& container, const int ix)
: Base::Cit(container, ix) {}
self_type operator-(const int n) const {
return self_type(*mutable_a(), ix_ - n);
}
int& operator*() const { return (*mutable_a())[ix_]; }
private:
C* mutable_a() const { return const_cast<C*>(container_); }
using Base::container_;
using Base::ix_;
};
template <typename C>
void foo(Cit<C>& it) {}
int main() {
typedef std::vector<int> V;
V a = {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5};
It<V> b(a, 2);
It<V> c(a, 2);
foo(b); // convert from It to Cit works.
b - c; // <----- This doesn't work. Why?
// Assert that result of (b - 1) is an It instead of a Cit.
*(b - 1) -= 1;
}
最佳答案
您的It<>::operator-(const int n)
隐藏了基类operator-
中的所有Cit<>
。
您需要在using Cit<C>::operator-;
中添加It<>
,以使这些运算符可见,如下所示:
template<typename C>
class It : public Cit<C> {
//...
public:
//....
using Cit<C>::operator-;
self_type operator-(const int n) const {
return self_type(*mutable_a(), ix_ - n);
}
https://godbolt.org/g/s76SSv