我已经为循环缓冲区编写了一个模板类:

template <class T> class CRingBuffer { /* ... */ };

此类执行的某些操作依赖于对T大小的准确评估。当TBYTE(即sizeof(T) == 1,选中)时,这似乎可以正常工作。但是,当我尝试使用TDWORD的同一类时,由于某种原因sizeof(T)的值为16。上次我检查时,双字是4个字节,而不是16个字节。有人知道为什么会这样吗?谢谢。

其他信息

由于其专有性,我无法发布所有代码,但是这里是有关的类声明和函数定义:
template <class T> class CRingBuffer
{
#pragma pack( push , 1 )                // align on a 1-byte boundary

typedef struct BUFFER_FLAGS_tag
{
    T * pHead;                          // Points to next buffer location to write
    T * pTail;                          // Points to next buffer location to read
    BOOL blFull;                        // Indicates whether buffer is full.
    BOOL blEmpty;                       // Indicates whether buffer is empty.
    BOOL blOverrun;                     // Indicates buffer overrun.
    BOOL blUnderrun;                    // Indicates buffer underrun.
    DWORD dwItemCount;                  // Buffer item count.
} BUFFER_FLAGS, *LPBUFFER_FLAGS;

#pragma pack( pop )                     // end 1-byte boundary alignment

    // Private member variable declarations
private:
    T * m_pBuffer;                      // Buffer location in system memory
    T * m_pStart;                       // Buffer start location in system memory
    T * m_pEnd;                         // Buffer end location in system memory
    BUFFER_FLAGS m_tFlags;              // Buffer flags.
    DWORD m_dwCapacity;                 // The buffer capacity.

    // CRingBuffer
public:
    CRingBuffer( DWORD items = DEFAULT_BUF_SIZE );
    ~CRingBuffer();

    // Public member function declarations
public:
    DWORD Add( T * pItems, DWORD num = 1, LPDWORD pAdded = NULL );
    DWORD Peek( T * pBuf, DWORD num = -1, DWORD offset = 0, LPDWORD pWritten = NULL );
    DWORD Delete( DWORD num, LPDWORD pDeleted = NULL );
    DWORD Remove( T * pBuf, DWORD num = 1, LPDWORD pRemoved = NULL );
    void Flush( void );
    DWORD GetItemCount( void );
    BYTE GetErrorStatus( void );

    // Private member function declarations
private:
    void IncrementHead( LPBUFFER_FLAGS pFlags = NULL );
    void IncrementTail( LPBUFFER_FLAGS pFlags = NULL );
};

template <class T> void CRingBuffer<T>::IncrementHead( LPBUFFER_FLAGS pFlags )
{
    ASSERT(this->m_pBuffer != NULL);
    ASSERT(this->m_pStart != NULL);
    ASSERT(this->m_pEnd != NULL);
    ASSERT(this->m_tFlags.pHead != NULL);
    ASSERT(this->m_tFlags.pTail != NULL);

    pFlags = ( pFlags == NULL ) ? &(this->m_tFlags) : pFlags;

    // Verify overrun condition is not set.
    if ( pFlags->blOverrun == FALSE )
    {
        pFlags->pHead += sizeof(T); // increament buffer head pointer
        pFlags->blUnderrun = FALSE; // clear underrun condition

        // Correct for wrap condition.
        if ( pFlags->pHead == this->m_pEnd )
        {
            pFlags->pHead = this->m_pStart;
        }

        // Check for overrun.
        if ( pFlags->pHead == pFlags->pTail )
        {
            pFlags->blOverrun = TRUE;
        }
    }
}

当执行pFlags->pHead += sizeof(T);IncrementHead时,会发生上述问题。

最佳答案

哦,毕竟这真的很简单:)

没有意识到这一点,在pFlags->pHead += sizeof(T);中,您使用了指针算法。 pHeadT的指针,当您将其增加sizeof(T)时,意味着您将其向前移动那么多T类型的元素,而不是您所想的那么多字节。因此T的大小平方。如果您的目标是将指针移到缓冲区的下一个元素,则应将其递增1:pFlags->pHead += 1;

关于c++ - 模板类类型的大小,我们在Stack Overflow上找到一个类似的问题:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/5984807/

10-17 00:29