我在下面的fscanf行上遇到了分段错误。我为每个变量添加了字符宽度以尝试对其进行修复,因此我不明白为什么它会出现段错误。
我从CSV文件读取了一个结构数组。
结构为:
typedef struct Person
{
int ID;
int salary;
int deleted;
char salutation[4];
char firstName[21];
char surName[31];
char job[16];
} Person;
我声明了结构数组:
Person* persons;
persons = (Person*)malloc(SIZE * sizeof(Person));
然后使用以下while循环将CSV文件读入以下值:
(我初始化为0)
while(fscanf(f, "%d,%3[^,],%20[^,],%30[^,],%15[^,],%d,%d", &inPersons[i].ID, inPersons[i].salutation, inPersons[i].firstName, inPersons[i].surName, inPersons[i].job, &inPersons[i].salary, &inPersons[i].deleted)!=EOF)
{
newID = inPersons[i].ID;
i++;
}
段故障在fscanf语句期间发生。我没有使用valgrind的经验,但是对于该行它给了我这个错误:
==16810== Invalid write of size 4
==16810== at 0x578215: _IO_vfscanf (in /lib/libc-2.12.so)
==16810== by 0x585368: __isoc99_fscanf (in /lib/libc-2.12.so)
==16810== by 0x8048951: loadDb (Database.c:23)
==16810== by 0x8048711: menu (Menu.c:37)
==16810== by 0x804861E: main (main.c:6)
==16810== Address 0x27230128 is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd
我也在同一行中得到了这些Valgrind错误:
==18457== Use of uninitialised value of size 4
==18457== at 0x405A215: _IO_vfscanf (in /lib/libc-2.12.so)
==18457== by 0x4067368: __isoc99_fscanf (in /lib/libc-2.12.so)
==18457== by 0x8048943: loadDb (Database.c:23)
==18457== by 0x8048711: menu (Menu.c:37)
==18457== by 0x804861E: main (main.c:6)
==18457== Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
==18457== Access not within mapped region at address 0x5C5E4128
==18457== at 0x405A215: _IO_vfscanf (in /lib/libc-2.12.so)
==18457== by 0x4067368: __isoc99_fscanf (in /lib/libc-2.12.so)
==18457== by 0x8048943: loadDb (Database.c:23)
==18457== by 0x8048711: menu (Menu.c:37)
==18457== by 0x804861E: main (main.c:6)
最佳答案
如果您在字母或标点符号处应该有一个数字,则表示存在无限循环,并且溢出了所分配人员的范围。您应该检查:
while (i < SIZE && (num = fscanf(f, "...", ...)) == 7)
{
...process valid input...
}
...consider what to do here, using `num` to distinguish between EOF and failed conversions...
valgrind
无法识别内存的事实令人困惑。您已经采取了大多数相关步骤来确保不会发生缓冲区溢出(所有步骤都必须正确检查fscanf()
的状态,否则除外)。哦...您分配了
persons
;您正在阅读inPersons
...这是正确的吗?我想我会写一个函数来调用
fscanf()
并检测并报告错误,然后从while
循环中调用它:while (i < SIZE && get_person(&persons[i]) != EOF)
...
要么:
while (i < SIZE && get_person(&inPersons[i]) != EOF)
...
这也允许您从
fscanf()
切换到fgets()
和sscanf()
或getline()
和sscanf()
。关于c - 使用fscanf时无法调试seg错误,我们在Stack Overflow上找到一个类似的问题:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/18971793/