我想在竞技场墙壁上的体育赛事中匹配图像上的商业横幅。我用this example。如果图像足够大,则其工作效果很好(scene_1
)。但是,如果存在某种失真,或者图片小于某个限制(scene_2
),那么它将变得疯狂,此外,OpenCV还会对完全互不相关的点进行匹配。
匹配成功与失败的示例:
有什么方法可以只匹配形成矩形的点?还是有更好的方法进行这样的匹配?我现在最大的问题是如何使其更加精确,因为它可以从10次事件中获得3次良好的匹配(此项目的目的是处理整个视频以获取某种统计信息)。
这是我的代码:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <iostream>
#include "opencv2/core/core.hpp"
#include "opencv2/features2d/features2d.hpp"
#include "opencv2/highgui/highgui.hpp"
#include "opencv2/calib3d/calib3d.hpp"
#include "opencv2/nonfree/nonfree.hpp"
using namespace cv;
void readme();
int main( int argc, char** argv )
{
if( argc != 3 )
{ readme(); return -1; }
Mat img_object = imread( argv[1], CV_LOAD_IMAGE_GRAYSCALE );
Mat img_scene = imread( argv[2], CV_LOAD_IMAGE_GRAYSCALE );
if( !img_object.data || !img_scene.data )
{ std::cout<< " --(!) Error reading images " << std::endl; return -1; }
//-- Step 1: Detect the keypoints using SURF Detector
int minHessian = 400;
SurfFeatureDetector detector( minHessian );
std::vector<KeyPoint> keypoints_object, keypoints_scene;
detector.detect( img_object, keypoints_object );
detector.detect( img_scene, keypoints_scene );
//-- Step 2: Calculate descriptors (feature vectors)
SurfDescriptorExtractor extractor;
Mat descriptors_object, descriptors_scene;
extractor.compute( img_object, keypoints_object, descriptors_object );
extractor.compute( img_scene, keypoints_scene, descriptors_scene );
//-- Step 3: Matching descriptor vectors using FLANN matcher
FlannBasedMatcher matcher;
std::vector< DMatch > matches;
matcher.match( descriptors_object, descriptors_scene, matches );
double max_dist = 0; double min_dist = 100;
//-- Quick calculation of max and min distances between keypoints
for( int i = 0; i < descriptors_object.rows; i++ )
{ double dist = matches[i].distance;
if( dist < min_dist ) min_dist = dist;
if( dist > max_dist ) max_dist = dist;
}
printf("-- Max dist : %f \n", max_dist );
printf("-- Min dist : %f \n", min_dist );
//-- Draw only "good" matches (i.e. whose distance is less than 3*min_dist )
std::vector< DMatch > good_matches;
for( int i = 0; i < descriptors_object.rows; i++ )
{ if( matches[i].distance < 3*min_dist )
{ good_matches.push_back( matches[i]); }
}
Mat img_matches;
drawMatches( img_object, keypoints_object, img_scene, keypoints_scene,
good_matches, img_matches, Scalar::all(-1), Scalar::all(-1),
vector<char>(), DrawMatchesFlags::NOT_DRAW_SINGLE_POINTS );
//-- Localize the object
std::vector<Point2f> obj;
std::vector<Point2f> scene;
for( int i = 0; i < good_matches.size(); i++ )
{
//-- Get the keypoints from the good matches
obj.push_back( keypoints_object[ good_matches[i].queryIdx ].pt );
scene.push_back( keypoints_scene[ good_matches[i].trainIdx ].pt );
}
Mat H = findHomography( obj, scene, CV_RANSAC );
//-- Get the corners from the image_1 ( the object to be "detected" )
std::vector<Point2f> obj_corners(4);
obj_corners[0] = cvPoint(0,0); obj_corners[1] = cvPoint( img_object.cols, 0 );
obj_corners[2] = cvPoint( img_object.cols, img_object.rows ); obj_corners[3] = cvPoint( 0, img_object.rows );
std::vector<Point2f> scene_corners(4);
perspectiveTransform( obj_corners, scene_corners, H);
//-- Draw lines between the corners (the mapped object in the scene - image_2 )
line( img_matches, scene_corners[0] + Point2f( img_object.cols, 0), scene_corners[1] + Point2f( img_object.cols, 0), Scalar(0, 255, 0), 4 );
line( img_matches, scene_corners[1] + Point2f( img_object.cols, 0), scene_corners[2] + Point2f( img_object.cols, 0), Scalar( 0, 255, 0), 4 );
line( img_matches, scene_corners[2] + Point2f( img_object.cols, 0), scene_corners[3] + Point2f( img_object.cols, 0), Scalar( 0, 255, 0), 4 );
line( img_matches, scene_corners[3] + Point2f( img_object.cols, 0), scene_corners[0] + Point2f( img_object.cols, 0), Scalar( 0, 255, 0), 4 );
//-- Show detected matches
imshow( "Good Matches & Object detection", img_matches );
waitKey(0);
return 0;
}
void readme()
{ std::cout << " Usage: ./SURF_descriptor <img1 - object> <img2 - scene>" << std::endl; }
最佳答案
尝试使用SIFT代替SURF。有人声称SURF更强大,但根据我的个人经验和CV社区中的最新趋势,SIFT仍然是要走的路。
此外,假设您只是尝试在目标图像中找到一个对象,则可以使用某种密度聚类方法进一步过滤掉一些离群值。使用DBSCAN改善检测质量的一个很好的例子是
Le,Viet Phuong等。 “通过基于同形异义字的后置过滤器改进徽标分类和文档分类的匹配。”文档分析与识别(ICDAR),2013年第12届国际 session 。 IEEE,2013年。
他们的方法非常直接且易于实现,我自己实现了它,发现它对某些任务非常有用。它只是一两百行代码。