Closed. This question is not reproducible or was caused by typos。它当前不接受答案。
想要改善这个问题吗?更新问题,以便将其作为on-topic用于堆栈溢出。
5年前关闭。
Improve this question
当运行此方法时,调用
错误是:
我真的不明白这是怎么回事。例如,如果我只是简单地使用
:: recv的原型(prototype)如下:
编辑另一个信息:如果我像这样
想要改善这个问题吗?更新问题,以便将其作为on-topic用于堆栈溢出。
5年前关闭。
Improve this question
当运行此方法时,调用
socket.getBytes
时我从Valgrind得到错误void Client::register(VMap::VType type, char *id)
{
const int sizeOfType = sizeof(type);
char *buffer = (char *) malloc(sizeOfType);
memcpy(buffer, &type, sizeOfType);
socket.send(buffer, sizeOfType);
sleep(1);
char *bufferRecv = (char *) malloc(sizeOfType);
memset(bufferRecv, 0 ,sizeOfType);
int size = socket.getBytes(bufferRecv);
free(buffer);
free(bufferRecv);
}
int Socket::getBytes(char *buf)
{
int ret = ::recv(m_sock, buf, MAXRECV, 0);
return ret;
}
错误是:
==30653== Syscall param socketcall.recvfrom(buf) points to unaddressable byte(s)
==30653== at 0x58C214C: recv (recv.c:34)
==30653== by 0x4E47B84: pippo::Socket::getBytes(char*) (Socket.cpp:115)
==30653== by 0x4E48BAE: pippo::Rossi::register(pippo::sMap::Type, char*) (Rossi.cpp:80)
==30653== by 0x4E48EEE: pippo::Rossi::initsMap(std::string) (Rossi.cpp:111)
==30653== by 0x4E486B0: pippo::Rossi::Rossi(std::string, std::string, std::string, unsigned int) (Rossi.cpp:54)
==30653== by 0x4E45884: test::TestRossi::testConstructor() (TestRossi.cpp:70)
==30653== by 0x4E456D8: test::TestRossi::testBody() (TestRossi.cpp:48)
==30653== by 0x5288D03: test::TestUnit::test() (TestUnit.cpp:42)
==30653== by 0x5288513: test::TestRunner::run() (TestRunner.cpp:44)
==30653== by 0x407F26: main (TestDUMBO.cpp:125)
==30653== Address 0x67a9d64 is 0 bytes after a block of size 4 alloc'd
==30653== at 0x4C2B6CD: malloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==30653== by 0x4E48B21: pippo::Rossi::register(pippo::sMap::Type, char*) (Rossi.cpp:76)
==30653== by 0x4E48EEE: pippo::Rossi::initsMap(std::string) (Rossi.cpp:111)
==30653== by 0x4E486B0: pippo::Rossi::Rossi(std::string, std::string, std::string, unsigned int) (Rossi.cpp:54)
==30653== by 0x4E45884: test::TestRossi::testConstructor() (TestRossi.cpp:70)
==30653== by 0x4E456D8: test::TestRossi::testBody() (TestRossi.cpp:48)
==30653== by 0x5288D03: test::TestUnit::test() (TestUnit.cpp:42)
==30653== by 0x5288513: test::TestRunner::run() (TestRunner.cpp:44)
==30653== by 0x407F26: main (TestDUMBO.cpp:125)
我真的不明白这是怎么回事。例如,如果我只是简单地使用
bufferRecv
编写sprintf
,则不会出现任何错误。:: recv的原型(prototype)如下:
/* Read N bytes into BUF from socket FD.
Returns the number read or -1 for errors.
This function is a cancellation point and therefore not marked with
__THROW. */
extern ssize_t recv (int __fd, void *__buf, size_t __n, int __flags);
编辑另一个信息:如果我像这样
char bufferRecv[4];
声明缓冲区,我不会从Valgrind得到任何错误。 最佳答案
对于其他有相同问题的用户:
正如@alk所建议的那样,我只是将getBytes方法更改如下:
int Socket::getBytes(char *buf, int sizeOfBuf)
{
int ret = ::recv(m_sock, buf, sizeOfBuf, 0);
return ret;
}